How do you make flzip with windows 7
-
Scrap Windows 7, you donât want it, itâs too complex for you.
Get back to XP.
New stuff is not for everyone all the time.
Leave it to the Techies.
Iâm going to wait for the great Next Release, as always.
Maybe IBM z/VM will run on the next generation, then I will hire a Systems Programmer to set it up for me and sell processing time, who knows - may have enough RAM in it to set up a Data Processing Bureau just like 40 years ago!! Or maybe even powerful enough to run BAâs online booking system again! The original system only had 6MB and ran fabulously!
-
you have a point there xp is deffinately the best os that windows came out with. when i made this computer it was to replace my vista but the os did not work because i changed the motherboard with a better one. so i bought a new hard drive and formated the old one and use it as a slave drive. windows xp is really hard to find these days and when i tried to put windows xp pro on my computer i got errors and the install would not complete. one thing about 7 is that its 100% better than vista 100 time more stable.
-
Youâve always been antiquated ST
Go back to play with your mainframes
Windows 7 is probably the best Windows OS, or at least a tie with XP. Itâs a proper evolution and finally a good upgrade path for die-hard XP fans.
-
Ubuntu > 7
Why do you want to, Gisteron?
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
Youâve always been antiquated STGo back to play with your mainframes
Windows 7 is probably the best Windows OS, or at least a tie with XP. Itâs a proper evolution and finally a good upgrade path for die-hard XP fans.
Just being sardonic.
You are quite right, W7 is the best so far but has some annoying quirks and plain sillies in it that need get-arounds to be worked out.
And the problem in retro Windows like XP is lack of drivers for the new motherboards, processors and other components, so W7 is the only way forward with new technology PCs.
My beloved mainframes are now just fading photos.
-
And the problem in retro Windows like XP is lack of drivers for the new motherboards, processors and other components, so W7 is the only way forward with new technology PCs.
Linux?
-
The Year of the Linux Desktop is still quite a way away, despite my best wishes for the platform. Sadly, drivers and games are whatâs killing it, as more often than not I want to play games every once in a while and half the time wireless drivers donât work on laptops.
@ST: Donât forget x64; XP 64-bit is⌠Letâs say not too good. And Iâm sure you can find mainframe emulators on the web
-
it is sensible to get FL to IPv6, as most other programs will run on it soon. approx. in three years all XP world will be running with win7 and everything that cannot will either die out or remain with people like us, who are interested in that while the common user will get to something new. kinda question of survival, you knowâŚ
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
The Year of the Linux Desktop is still quite a way away, despite my best wishes for the platform. Sadly, drivers and games are whatâs killing it, as more often than not I want to play games every once in a while and half the time wireless drivers donât work on laptops.Well, many Windows applications, including games, do also run at Linux with the compability layer Wine ( = Wine is not an emulator).
Plus: You can also setup a dual boot. I have done this but I have never used XP since I installed Ubuntu.
The support from companies for Linux isnât SUCH high yet, but it is a way more than some years ago. I definitivly see an upcoming trend/t for Linux. It might take 5+ years, but the trend is there. Linux also gets used more and more in schools, universities and so on.@ST: Donât forget x64; XP 64-bit is⌠Letâs say not too good. And Iâm sure you can find mainframe emulators on the web
Hm, have heard this already a few times, a friend of mine does say that the 64 bit support isnât worse than Vistaâs/7âs, though. Dunno what is correct.
-
XP 64-bit was half-assed, late-coming and generally horrible. Vista and particularly 7 have full x64 support out of the box and work great; most manufacturers release both x86 and x64 drivers for these OS.
And please donât kid yourself, Wine isnât an alternative. I donât want to get a 50% FPS hit just to run on Linux, sorry, and thatâs when the game even works.
Same for dual booting really, sounds great initially but the shutdown/startup process is far too long and cumbersome. You always end up picking one OS and only logging on that one. Except I still want to play games without lag and/or bugs, so I picked Windows. Didnât you say you donât even have FL running yet?
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
XP 64-bit was half-assed, late-coming and generally horrible. Vista and particularly 7 have full x64 support out of the box and work great; most manufacturers release both x86 and x64 drivers for these OS.And please donât kid yourself, Wine isnât an alternative. I donât want to get a 50% FPS hit just to run on Linux, sorry, and thatâs when the game even works.
Same for dual booting really, sounds great initially but the shutdown/startup process is far too long and cumbersome. You always end up picking one OS and only logging on that one. Except I still want to play games without lag and/or bugs, so I picked Windows. Didnât you say you donât even have FL running yet?
Eh, I havenât re-tried for a while
Well, I didnât say that all games work perfectly or well enough to be played with wine, but some do!
Examples are, for instance, WoW, Warcraft III, Guild WarsâŚ
I donât claim all games work with wine, but it definitivly canât be said that no game runs with it.DB: Ok, this might be true, but if you have the ressources (means, a newer PC) it might be worth to take it into consideration.
-
My PCâs got a compatibility issue with the GPU making it take around 2 minutes to boot instead of 30 seconds. No, not happening.
And all the games youâre listing are old games that would run well on just about any configuration. Go ahead and try playing Crysis or Mass Effect 2 or Metro 2033 on Wine.
-
And all the games youâre listing are old games that would run well on just about any configuration. Go ahead and try playing Crysis or Mass Effect 2 or Metro 2033 on Wine.
What do you mean by âany configurationâ? The software (wine in this case) needs to be written, to what are you referring to? It is not a matter of course that windows software runs at a totally different OS.
Plus for old games, this is of course the case since it takes time to build wine. In short: The older and the more popular a game the higher is the chance that it will work with wine.Metro 2033:
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=19666Silver rating.
ME 2:
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=19125Silver rating.
-
WoW runs on netbooks. Warcraft 3 too. Guild Wars runs on any computer released within the last 7 years. My point is that even if you get a 50% hit, going from 200FPS to 100FPS is unnoticeable.
But going from 30 to 15 is horrible. The Wine people purposefully avoid speaking of benchmarks because it is IMPOSSIBLE not to get a performance hit, and for games that already cause lag on Windows, it can be a make or break issue.
Even Linux diehards agree that it isnât for games.
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
WoW runs on netbooks. Warcraft 3 too. Guild Wars runs on any computer released within the last 7 years. My point is that even if you get a 50% hit, going from 200FPS to 100FPS is unnoticeable.Can hardly discuss with you here since I am very uninformed about the performance stuff. But as for Warcraft III I can say there doesnât seems to be such much of a performance malus, as it didnât run smoothly at my Windows XP I can judge about it a bit. Plus, actually, I have a very old PC from about ~2004, 1 GB RAM, 2.1 Ghz single-core processor, ATI Radeon 9550.
So, it isnât just the case that it just isnât noticable and runs badly, I personally have encountered totally the contrarity with Warcraft III (Note: WC 3 is from 2002/2003).
Also, Wine doesnât emulate a windows environment but ports the applications instructions to the linux ones, from what I do know.
http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-c9e6502ad636315e905d07f7e44594757a6738e3But going from 30 to 15 is horrible. The Wine people purposefully avoid speaking of benchmarks because it is IMPOSSIBLE not to get a performance hit, and for games that already cause lag on Windows, it can be a make or break issue.
Even Linux diehards agree that it isnât for games.
Well, this is wrong as well. It isnât such a gaming platform as windows, true, but some indie developers make games for Linux as well (also commercial ones). Also, it is suspected that Steam is going to publish itâs games for Linux as well.
-
Valve has announced their support for Linux, mostly since theyâre porting them to OSX. Doesnât mean youâll see more than Half-Life out there.
Warcraft 3 was an extremely popular game that, compared to modern games, uses very few advanced techniques. I damn well hope itâll run good on Wine, or youâd be in serious troubles.
And I know it isnât an emulator (itâs in the name), but ANY layer between the OS and the application causes a hit in performance. When you need to translate the entire DirectX layer into OpenGL, this can be substantial.
