NASA News Conf: astrobiology finding that will impact search for evidence of extraterrestrial life
-
Ive downloaded a few of them, some are extremely high detail. They could use texturing though, the color on them is simply a colored poly.
@Nexose - that was perfect
-
Havenāt seen Contact yet, although Iām a big Sagan fan. Well, a relatively big Sagan fan, as I havenāt read all his books yet, not even the ones I own.
First Iāve to finish Phil Plaitās Death From The Skies, a funny and well-written account of all nasty things from outer space that could finish us.
Anyway in a nutshell, if the rumours are correct, the NASA conference is gonna address a kind of bacteria, in the DNA of which scientists replaced phosphor molecules with arsenic. The bacteria is fine, and so the range of chemical possibilities for life (as we know / imagine it) has become larger, and consequently the various types of environment in which life could occur.
This doesnāt seem very thrillingā¦ It is for scientist and/or people who are really into this sort of thing, but I fear many ordinary people might be bored or disappointed by such an announcement.
-
i always found it ridiculous that a planet is considered to be able to care life if it has water and a climate allowing it to be liquid. if there is life out there it is not even likely that their organisms will be similar with the ones of earth creatures.
a sentense i heard though was that an intelligent life form beyond our planet will most likely have a mass somewhere between 10 gramms and 5 tonns. āeverything else would be inefficient for the evolution of an intelligent mindā wtf?? xD -
Gisteron wrote:
i always found it ridiculous that a planet is considered to be able to care life if it has water and a climate allowing it to be liquid. if there is life out there it is not even likely that their organisms will be similar with the ones of earth creatures.
a sentense i heard though was that an intelligent life form beyond our planet will most likely have a mass somewhere between 10 gramms and 5 tonns. āeverything else would be inefficient for the evolution of an intelligent mindā wtf?? xDWell, there are some restrictions. Complex patterns need to be able to be formed, so scientists can substantiate the distinction between an educated guess and wild speculation.
I agree with you though that we should be careful with thinking too limited though. Lifeforms might evolve in the interior of stars, or on the accretion discs around black holes, and we not at all recognize such a lifeform, and that might or might not be mutual.
-
Hopefully if we ever found intelligent life out there I would hope their biology was significantly different from our own. This would mean they would would need a different types of world to live on than the one we would need (nitrogen/oxygen planets). In that case we would pretty much live in isolation from said species with no competition for similar planetary makeups.
As humans we are a fairly violent species and if they werent advanced enough to fend us off they wouldnāt last long. The same could be said for us if they were much more advanced than us (unlike the wimps called Nomads in FL).
-
LancerSolurus wrote:
Hopefully if we ever found intelligent life out there I would hope their biology was significantly different from our own. This would mean they would would need a different types of world to live on than the one we would need (nitrogen/oxygen planets). In that case we would pretty much live in isolation from said species with no competition for similar planetary makeups.Indeed, but what if they can change the Earth to be better for them? i mean maybe they can change atmosphere or somethingā¦ Iām really worry about it. You know if we really found aliens, aliens will may found us too.
They maybeā¦is real nomad (or nomadic?), and we donāt know if they already know about āEnvironmental Protectionā or āSustainable Developmentā, and we almost cannot defend our home planet if they come to suck our planet off.
==========HAHAHAHA Separatrix=========
To be honestā¦ I very like to write something about alien culture or something like that in my mod storyā¦ and i already added two faction for aliens and more for space creaturesā¦ but if i really encounter aliensā¦maybeā¦hummmmā¦
Finally, Just hope the way of them to say āGood Byeā is different from the āScare Moveā LOL
-
And what about reptilian intelligency? Is it possible? We donāt know the number of possibilties so all things can be done!
Woops! I donāt really understood this threadā¦ And I wanted to say I hope their is not humanoid lifeformes only, it could be borring to see that and I hope their is reptilian species, like Dragons (really impressive). I hope too, Dragons are very very intelligent like 3 X human intelligence (but I think Iām dreaming).
-
Well, did anyone catch it? Unfortunately I wasnt at home when it was being shown.
-
NASA found some organisms, in fact they found some bacterium or something well change the define of organisms.
-
They found bacteria that are based of arsenic, which is normally toxic to most/all life forms. Thus, the possibilities are even larger than what we wouldāve expected as far as diversity goes.
-
After taking a look at a periodic table, I can see how arsinic could be used in place of phosphorous. It is directly below it which means it has pretty similar properties. The same could also be said of the other elements making up a dna strand.
-
LancerSolurus wrote:
After taking a look at a periodic table, I can see how arsinic could be used in place of phosphorous. It is directly below it which means it has pretty similar properties. The same could also be said of the other elements making up a dna strand.Right, it is the same idea as the Horta, which is based on silicon rather than carbon. It is yet another Star Trek prediction proven.
Dammit, Jim, Iām a doctor, not a bricklayer!
-
Silicon was known to be a possibility for a while, arsenic is another matter entirely because while silicon is mostly inert, arsenic is some really nasty stuff.
-
Not really FF. Funny how arsenic is mentioned just as this pops up in the news
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11886943
Silicon has been talked about by scientists as well for years as a basis for life. Weāll never know until we meet someone/something, simple as that. Like the chick in Independance Day said,āI hope they bring back Elvisā
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
arsenic is another matter entirely because while silicon is mostly inert, arsenic is some really nasty stuff.While arsenic might be a more potent toxin than silicon, both are toxic for similar reasonsā¦ they can replace elements that are required for life-supporting organic molecules, including DNA.
Both carbon and silicon are in Group 14, and have a valency of 4, which means that they will react with just about anything. Truly inert elements are in Group 18 with a valency of 8.
This is similar to Lancerās point that arsenic and phosphorus are in Group 15. From a Periodic Table point of view, arsenic is to phosphorus as silicon is to carbon.
That is why I mentioned Hortas.
-
I know that. The point is that Si is mostly found in compounds such as SiO2, which are perfectly inert, while As can be found more often as a pure element and that it and many of its compounds are very potent poisons.
Itās a lot easier to use an inert element for a building block of life than it is to use something that tends to wreck anything multicellularā¦
You might as well consider Germanium-based life forms, but again itās just even tougher to use Ge than it is to use C or Si because itās both far more rare than C or Si and itās more toxic than C or Si.
-
Bullwinkle wrote:
Dammit, Jim, Iām a doctor, not a bricklayer!
:lol: I used the same quote in a similar discussion on another forum. Maybe it is quoted a lot of times these days, on various fora discussing the NASA find.
Btw Bullwinkle: you never enlightened me whether or not your nick comes from the song in the Pulp Fiction soundtrack
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
I know that.If you understand the chemistry, then what are you arguing about?
Or, if not really arguing then I misunderstood. Anyway, here is further explanation, just in case:Silicon and arsenic are poison to humans, but they might be a normal part of a Hortaās diet.
SiO2 is stable, on Earth, at STP, in absence of catalysts, but that does not mean that it is inert. The same could be said of C02. But it does not really matter to our previous discussion because these are molecules rather than elements.
Consider chlorine and sodium. They are both extremely reactive and toxic, but sodium chloride (table salt) is both stable and a required part of our diets. The molecules have very different properties than the elements themselves.
The reason that semiconductors work is because of the magic of valence-four elements. They react with just about anything except for Group 18 elements. While the reactivity of carbon and silicon is low, they are far from inert.
The NASA announcement proves that our previous notions of ālifeā are wrong. It was widely believed that life required carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur. Now we know, for certain, that other chemistries can also work.
This opens the door to the possibility of life in other temperatures, gravities, light, radiation, and atmospheric environments. The big deal here is that it means that universe could be teaming with life, although it might not be anything like terrestrial life.
In other words, what is ātoxicā to you may not be toxic at all to a Hortaā¦ or to other alien life forms.
Le malheur des uns fait le bonheur des autres, non?
@Moohhead: Yes, the Horta analogy fits NASAās announcement perfectly. As for my nickname, I answered, and gave you the entire story. You never responded. Check your PMs from several months ago.
