At MOHANADHASSAN….

StarTrader wrote:

Let’s change the subject to learn instead of continuing to heckle and badger and anger each other…

NexOse - please tell us about China, I really do have no idea other than what the press tells us and we know a lot of this is based on troubles.

What you want to know? If you want a intro… just search wiki…

Wikis and news don’t tell us about the feelings of the people.

You are a citizen, you can tell us the reality?

I’m skip

See you guys outside.

You’re such an ass sometimes ST.

One thing before I leave this thread for good.

Thought this was the right place for off-topic discussion?

Back to FL, no sense hanging around here.

It is the right place for off topic discussion, but sadly the way the thread went, “discussion” isn’t the correct term to be applied.

To be willing to discuss subject matter in a mature and sensible manner you need to be open, and transparent, to allow people to form opinions about your viewpoints which are based upon evidence.
Whether they reach a similar conclusion, or a different conclusion to your own opinion based upon the evidence is the thing that makes debating topics (politics especially) enjoyable.

However, let me put this forward:

95% of Libyans hate Gaddaffi and wanted him gone - but were too scared to say anything!!

Would this be an acceptable point upon which to discuss the legitimacy of the Libyan uprising with yourself, and trusting it is entirely true, that therefore you should change your opinion? Or would you refute this claim as being false?

To be open to discussion and debate you have to be open to altering your opinion or expanding your knowledge in the face of evidence. If you are NOT open to altering opinion or expanding knowledge, then discussion is pointless… I don’t think anyone should change opinions when supposed “evidence” has no validity through references of legitimate sources (friends blogs are not legitimate! ).

Discussions fail due to a lack of maturity, respect and transparency.

This post is probably highly patronising to most people, but I’d love to discuss subject matter as I often find people showing a perspective I had not considered, or things I had not noticed. However, it is nigh on impossible to do so on the internet without it descending into a farce. It is a shame, because if for no other reason, the internet should be the ideal location due to the easy and convenient access to supporting evidence!

BTW - last night I had a guest (friend of a friend staying at mine to catch an early train in the morning - so convenience stop-over). His knowledge of politics is much greater than mine, as is his observation (I don’t read papers, only online news sites). I did enjoy this from him, a quick thing that came up during a discussion - have you noticed how whenever anything bad is said, it is Vince Cable who is saying it? Liberal Democrats really should oppose this strategy more, as it is painting a picture in people’s minds

Dear FF,

Before we talking other endless topic, i have a simple suggest to make people exactly understand what this broad is: Rename this broad to Wide Talking Forum.

Is anyone think this is a good idea?

Chips, old pal…

My reaction was to FF telling me I’m blowing things out of my arse.

That approach is not conducive to a discussion.

I made my riposte so that he is clear on my next step should his bad attitude to me continue.

After his previous attack with regard to me defining the spec for Schmackbolzen’s sur converter saying it was only my spec and mine alone, intimating that it was therefore invalid, which I ignored (but did not forget, a croc never forgets), this was too much.

I am well open to debate but will not take this kind of attack without response. I don’t ask others for proof, this is childish and disrespectful, and I prefer to ask for more information and try to understand on what basis they make their comments and points of view.

Funny how people turned on me but not on FF, huh.

I don’t need defendants, I have the sentence construction skills to respond. FF called that “menaces”. Hmmm… And threatened that this is their website, like “beware or we’ll kick you off”. Big kids’ stuff, reminds me of my school days like “I’m going to get my big brother onto you!”. Without an audience (us lot) it would not matter whose website, there would be none.

Anyway, here’s more debate fodder for those still interested…

Libya is only one topic, my experience and knowledge is first hand in (I will now be specific for total clarity): Egypt, Lebanon, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Dubai, AbuDhabi, Greece, Cyprus. Going back more years: Germany , Holland, Belgium, France, Italy, USA. Oh - and Malta. And in Canada I discovered an unbelievable man-made problem in a fantastic country that should have no conflicts.

But let’s stick to the Arab countries. Who else here has lived and talked with those people and can cast fair and valid comment / assessment?

My qualification: I lived and worked among them for many years, with colleagues and with customer banks and ministries at up to director and AGM levels, some extremely rich and successful business owners, and I socialised with them, held discussions, learning from them about their politics, attitudes, and outlook. I’m not boasting. FF asked for my proof - I am giving my experiences and sources.

I enjoy listening and learning from people from other cultures. I take the English and American “news” and the views of the ordinary western public with a pinch of salt, it is often flavoured and biased when I compare it with my own knowledge where I have any. I never state “facts” on the affairs of countries I know nothing about. I have followed Ghaddafi since he came to power, he is not alone, he is well supported by many of his people - maybe they are all just as “mad” as he is or he would have been deposed long ago. I know he attacked Chad, Egypt, threatened everyone around him, sponsored terrorism. But he did control the Libyan tribes, by allowing them a certain level of self-rule. In return they did not turn against him - why would they? They were not afraid of him, they are powerful and fear no other tribe, and historically they warred on each other as well as on neighbouring countries. Today some of the Libyan population want him out. I do sympathise to a degree, and their reason is the same as our own discontent - the recession, not “long-term hatred of Ghaddafi” which is what the West (UK & US) are promoting. But many still do not. Saddam kept Iraq under control. Look where it is now. These countries are tribal and need strong leaders. If they have weak ones they will overthrow them and there will be more like todays’ Iraq, see Afghanistan.

But the view of the West is that every country should be friendly and a trade partner - my view: why should any country not be hostile to the West? The US is often hostile to its neighbours without provocation. What a model.

My point was that any lawful government (just as that of Libya is) has the right to defend itself, and no other country has the right to attempt to overthrow it. Even as recently as last year the actual majority of Libyans loved him because he got his Lockerbie bomber home. And despite his recent unpopularity he still has majority support, or his army would already have turned against him. If things deteriorate then his own army will turn on him unanimously if they blame him. This is obvious. How is that “blowing things out of my arse”?

The initially orderly dissidents in Libya were then armed by foreign countries (guess who?) and this has now led to a bloody civil war. My suspicions are that it is all about petroleum, as was Iraq and as was Kuwait, where the US got them to sign a 10-year agreement to sell as much oil as the US wanted for a fixed price of $7 per barrel, the extraction cost, as well as buying goods that had failed to sell in the USA like galvanised steel water pipes, Chevrolet Caprices, in return for the “Liberation of Kuwait”. When Kuwait refused to renew the contract at extraction prices on its expiry, the war on Iraq was waged, and 80% support was gained by frightening the gullible American public with threats of WMDs that did not exist. That did not work in the UK and Blair took England to war with only 20% support.

So - I am open to mature cordial debate, even heated debate, but not to comments about the verbosity of my posterior nor for demands for proof when proof is still all around - you can all research Ghaddafi, from the beginning - it was a bloodless coup, by a cadet officer aged 27. Indicating what? That one man all alone can control an entire country of many tribes already slightly hostile to each other, and unite them, when I am not able to gain control of this friendly website, even by threatening to bite FF’s backside? (Do you get my analogy)? Yeh I know I’m annoying him but I’ve still not insulted him.

NexOse - No, I don’t like your first choice of title, it is not sensible in English. Try again?

Why don’t you want to tell me / us about China, since I ask?

My reason is that I know little about China other than the “news” of troubles, which does not make the government look good, and that has already been changed to cover worse historical events that I saw on TV at the time it happened. Remember I am a lot older than most people here, and my memory is not in poor health just yet. Is there a possible problem to you if you answer, will you risk being arrested as a dissident? Or are you a supporter of your government? Yes, I’m expecting another “Skip”.

Have fun people. But keep it objective and let’s not get personal again, shall we.

And I will wear my heart on my sleeve - when I recover my usual cynical composure and huggable outlook I will go back to my Mad March Hare avatar so you will all know.

I’ve washed my hands off this topic. Feel free to continue, but I don’t care enough to try to do a “discussion” under these conditions. I’ve asked twice to get sources, first politely, second a little more strongly, only to get that? Nah, thanks, I’ve got my load.

So ST, just kindly don’t refer to me again in here please? I’m not going to respond anyways because it would only cause further trouble, which I’m not here to do. If things get dirty for any reason from anyone, this gets the lock, but otherwise, do whatever the hell you wish.

@NeXoSE: I’ve renamed the board to General Discussion, which I’d thought we did in fact have already but apparently we did not (we only had one for FL, which I’ve renamed Freelancer Discussion).

StarTrader wrote:
Chips, old pal…
NexOse - No, I don’t like your first choice of title, it is not sensible in English. Try again?

Why don’t you want to tell me / us about China, since I ask?

Well, I already tried, but i realized i cannot understand this country with my limit knowledge.

You know every country made by yellow race is hard to clearly understand. If you don’t believe, just ask those Japanese.

We not directly say anyone’s bad, we smile to you even we hate you. So there is too many secrets i don’t know.

Ok, back to what you ask, will i risk being arrested as a dissident?

Well, If you ask this at total probability, yes, i will be. But this depends on lot of factors. CCP’s habit is: Hunt the leader and important member. If im the leader or important member, i will got 100% probability to be arrested if i’m being there.

And about “Are you a supporter of your government?”

I really don’t know how to answer this question. I’m over 20 years old and i never seen ballot paper. So that’s the mean of the Support?

Ok, be serious, in China you can hear people drat CCP more than praise it (say 20% for a optimistic estimate?). But there is only one item in this Radio Button Group. We not democracy country yet and looks CCP never want open the door for democracy.

Remember China just a weak country which in there, people working very hard for about just $300 monthly pay, and have to bear heavy tax and life stress.

Do you like my answer now?

My problem with your stance ST is you seem to be looking at everything from the perspective of an older person. You’re looking at the past, history stretching back many years and generations even. I think your view is probably very similar to that of the older generations in Libya and Egypt, and that of their very old leaders aswell. Mubarak and Gaddafi are bloody old, they’ve held power over generations and they live in the past.

This is a young persons revolution that’s taking place, they don’t care for your older views or that of their leaders and older generations, they certainly don’t care about whatever glorious past there might have been either, they care about now.

Over 60% of Egypts population is under 30 years of age, they’re well educated, lots of graduates and most of them college educated. 85 - 90% of the unemployed in Egypt are also under 30 years of age, do you think that makes them happy with Mubarak? If you answer yes to that then you’re insane.

This is a pattern that repeats itself all accross the middle east and north africa, overwhelming unemployment in the under 30 age group whilst being the largest percentage of the population. You can call on your knowledge of politics and history all you like, the people you spoke to probably had jobs and were doing okay in life, but that’s not representative of a population.

These revolutions are just the result of a seriously pissed off youth, they have nothing to lose so they’re ready to risk everything. Pretty soon this problem is going to play out around the globe, we only have to look at the UK to see the massive unemployment ratio in the under 25 age group. Pissed off young people makes for a lot of damage.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/01/27/the_arab_world_s_youth_army?page=0,2

NexOse: Yes, you have given me some information that I didn’t have before, thanks.

You mention monthly pay of around $300 per month, this is of course very poor by western measures, but I can tell you that there are people in Greece who are earning around €300 per month but it is enough to buy them food, and of course 2 or more are working in each house - that is 2 parents and some children who are old enough. But they don’t have cars, they work in the fields on farms on roads and so on. In Cyprus they pay farm workers from Poland around €400 per month, and they still come there to work.

So for us to compare, what is the cost of food items in China? I don’t know what items to ask, for example a dozen eggs, a kilo of flour, a kilo of lamb or what other meat?

Timmy: Yes the people in those countries I know about feel they have no future - but we are in the same position too at our age.

Irrespective of our discussions, nobody has acknowledged the right of soverignty of every lawful government, not only Libya’s.

The saddest thing is that no matter what new government is put in, there will be nochange for the poor people. Those at the top of the chain will change, or be imprisoned, or maybe worse. But the poor will remain poor and in the same conditions if not worse. Without a strong leader the various factions will end up fighting each other.

The government are there for the people, if the people don’t want them then they should leave. There’s no way any leader would last as long as they have without total corruption. They control state tv and media, there’s only one message. What little opposition they allow can’t get any message out to the people, the only way is through staging public rally, which is quickly broken up and leaders arrested, beaten, sometimes mysteriously never heard from again.

It doesn’t matter if they are tribal. With free and fair elections, the government would be made up of many tribes, each with a voice, not one tribe ruling all of the rest. Look at Iraq, ruled by sunnis and sadam all that time, with no voice for the shia who were treated like second class citizens and massacred. They might be making slow progress but they have a parliament which concists of both now. I’m sure they will keep on fighting and killing each other for quite some time, just as in Northern Ireland, but if you ever needed proof that things can change then you need look no further. Sometimes things have to get worse before they can get better.

Bottom line, just because a government was supposedly elected to rule, doesn’t mean it can’t be removed. Can’t justify going to war against your own population to hold onto power, not in this age, at least the Egyptians realised that. Gadaffi on the other hand is living up to his name as the mad dog of the east rather well, dangerous dogs get put down eventually.

StarTrader wrote:
NexOse: Yes, you have given me some information that I didn’t have before, thanks.

So for us to compare, what is the cost of food items in China? I don’t know what items to ask, for example a dozen eggs, a kilo of flour, a kilo of lamb or what other meat?

Well, this is a author question hardly to answer. If you know Chinese food, you know that’s a complex stuff. And you know China is large in area, so every place has different food price.

In China, we use a traditional unit to count food’s weight, so there is no a dozen of something or a kilo of something. The common unit is “Jin” in Chinese pinyin, and it almost equal to 1/2 kilogram.

So in there, Jiangsu province:

Eggs: ￥3.40 / Jin
Lamb Meat: ￥20 / Jin

About flour… There is a lot’s of kind flour…

There you just asked is few things in Chinese food, if you want to know more, here and here (For Hebei province) is wholesale price of most primary chinese food material. Retail price will high than this.

The total price of food is be forcely lower by CCP. I remember CCP gives lot’s of money and manpower to lower the food price at last year, so there not the main problem in China right now.

The mainly problem for China i believe is welfare and life stress as I say. Because of low welfare, people have to take out money for her parents, because hes parents maybe is old and cannot work to support their life by themself OR just for Anit-Accidents like get ill. Be broked by ill is not very rare in China, even government tried to stop this.

i am from Oman and i still playing FL

we have biggest problem in oman after special force attacked , they killed one from Peaceful demonstrators ! that was At dawn !

Ah so your perspectives are from personal experience. Nothing wrong with that whatsoever, as long as it is known Again, hopefully not patronising but explaining where some of us may be coming from.

For me I always like sources when it comes to overall (big picture) type statements. I like to be able to discern from where the data originates. From publications, which aren’t necessarily unbiased but should be, is ideal - as they’ve usually conducted (and state this clearly) some form of survey.

When it comes to individual experience, it doesn’t mean it isn’t true per se, but you do have to be aware as it is likely to have that individuals personal opinion factored into it (and be more of a small picture - local representation).

I think this is the issue people, including me, are stuck on. You said 70% of people in Libya. Without sources to survey of a randomly selected respresentational cross-section of the Libyan people, this is not something you can actually reliably state let alone expect people to believe. In other words, if it is 70% of those you knew/met, this does not necessarily represent a fair cross section of society… big vs little. Doesn’t mean that the “70% of Libyans” statement isn’t true, but it does mean it is unreliable/unverified…sorry.

I do think personal experience is entirely valid and like to hear it. However, it should never be utilised to represent an entire nations view - which is how you came off as doing. If I were to take a similar approach, I could say the recent banking crisis has had zero impact upon the UK whatsoever. Why? Because I, and my friends, have experienced nothing negative. I don’t think many would appreciate us painting such a rosey picture for the nation based upon our very limited perspective (I’m a student with guaranteed funding for another year - so my income is 100% safe, and my outgoings remain fairly constant).

What experience does allow, however, is the impact of certain aspects which aren’t common knowledge, reported, or anything else. Never knew squat about Kuwait oil deal…it wasn’t on the news after all.

However, how reliable is it? Personally I’d now have to look it up, as the earlier statements undermine my confidence

edit as for insults / rantings, I generally ignore such stuff

I started this for a good reason, to put across a viewpoint that is not the “western” thinking. I enjoy learning, and thought some people here might too when I am in a position to enlighten others.

And it serves as a diversion while Schmackbolzen completes his exams and hopefully will complete his sur converter.

NexOse - thanks for the comparison you gave. It is still not clear that $300 is a lot of money in local currency in China for people living a non-city life. I understand that $300 is not enough to have a nice apartment and a nice car and support a modern family of wife plus 3-4 kids. But this is the same in many European countries. Until only 30 years ago people in Cyprus had no cars, and only a few had a telephone and a TV. A whole family of 4 then could live comfortably on $60 per week, $300 per month. It was the same here in the UK 50 years ago when people earned around $30 per week. Today in Greece most island families have less than $300 per month. And a loaf of bread there costs €0.80 and a kilo of average fish costs around €8.00. In the UK the average salary is more than $3000 per month and a loaf of bread costs around $1.90 and a kilo of average fish costs around $27 per kilo, lamb is around $10 per kilo. So food is relatively cheap here - but then we pay council taxes and fuel is expensive, car running costs are expensive, parking costs are expensive, getting to work by public transport is expensive, and other payments take a lot of money out of our pockets every month that we cannot spend on ourselves. Here it is not possible to close your door, turn off the electricity and gas and water and escape from “running” expenses. I know I can do that (except for water) in many other countries.

On the other hot debate:-

One of my points is that people in the “west” should not apply their own standards and expectations to other countries because you do not fully understand the culture, you disagree with their fundamental beliefs, with their fundamental values of discipline, respect and order (not enforced but of themselves), and therefore you cannot relate to nor judge what is good for those peoples or countries. Your expectation is to have a say in your country’s behaviour and for nobody to control your life, including having no discipline if you so see fit, nor have it imposed on you (by the way this shows in virtually every UK senior school). But this has never been the way in many countries. Consider yourself lucky. But in fact we are all controlled in not-so-evident ways (heavy fines, taxation, prejudice, victimisation) and we all have very little say in our country’s behaviour. Think about this and you might agree.

On Saddam, the shia and sunni - there is victimisation of shia in virtually every arab country, for a long-standing religious difference. The Iraqi Ba’ath party held supremacy because they were the largest party, and supported Arab unity! But you don’t mention the Kurds or the people classified as “marsh Arabs” - various tribes - who repeatedly tried to overthrow the government. One tribe tried to ambush Saddam, to kill him - so they died. All 150 of them, it was stated in his trial, one of the reasons for which he was hanged. I don’t know the details, but what did it mean to me? Big deal - you risk, you may die, this is the risk, we are not talking about kids’ games, but about death as the stake. Seek the death of another, especially a well-supported other, and it is your risk that you might be killed instead. You yourselves would mobilise your own forces against them if it were you in power and in the gunsight. If Saddam had done this while in popularity with the Yanks, it would have been called “a failed coup attempt against the legitimate government of Iraq”.

Tribal - you’ve not lived in a tribe and you do not understand tribal, evidently, when you think your imagined view is what happens. I will try ot explain to you what really happens in tribal countries; many still live in the desert, in semi-permanent camps, not in cities. Just like your Gypsies in your countries, but more of them and more powerful and more aggressive. They team up to depose others, usually by political influence, and then they turn on each other in a continual struggle for position and for control. In extreme times they will take to arms even today. This is the natural thing for them to do, it is not different families of the same people, but different peoples from different parts of different countries, and each has its own “royalty”, a Sheikh, whose blood-line goes back a thousand years in some cases. Some have in fact originated from the same families, when some rebellious young man who would not follow his leaders was thrown out or went his own way of his own choice to start his own tribe - raiding and killing members of other tribes to live. They are only in the same geographic countries today because the Brits, French, Belgians and Turks divided the territories as they saw fit. Even in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, they are paid by the governments in cash and in favours to keep the peace. This is how tribalism works. It is an ancient liaison of convenience just as it is in business today between large corporations - and oil consumers! In Kuwait, 40% are originally from Saudi tribes, 40% from Iraqi tribes and 10% Iranian origin, and 10% others. If you saw “Lawrence of Arabia” did you think the tribes were just a myth, just to make the story more “action”? Or did you think they teamed up permanently after they were temporarily united against the Turks? How do you think “the poor people” would like being ruled by another strong tribe replacing the last one? They really believe that they can vote who gets in, right? Choose one of their local people that they think will look after them? No. That is not what will happen, not even on Egypt.

Go on from there. Check the history of Afghanistan for the past 200 years. Start from here: http://www.onwar.com/aced/nation/all/afghan/index.htm

Those people should be left to sort out their problems alone, they have always fought each other and united only against an external invader - Brits, Persians, Russians all tried it in the past, and not just recently. When this session of Yank and Brit intervention is over they will go back to fighting each other again until another militia or stronger tribal union enforces peace on them again. And then it will all repeat, ad infinitum.

The model modern tribal Arab soceity is the UAE. Each state is the home of a ruling tribe with a following of other minor tribes. Since you don’t like what I say because it is I that says it, read about Sheikh Rashid Al-Maktoum of Dubai, to learn how he honourably united two continually-warring tribes. He was the father of Sheikh Mohammed Al-Maktoum. Tell us here what exactly he did that was significant, so I know you are researching properly. That should teach what Tribes really means.

Everyone here seems stuck on Libya and “Ghaddafi get out”. Wrong. He needs to restore order. But it is not just him fighting alone, and he is not threatening his generals with death. They are providing their support to his government willingly, and so are his forces of ordinary soldiers. You still choose to overlook that his government is still the lawful government of that country. Apply your own percentages if you refuse mine - at what point do you think does a minority become a majority, or a majority become a minority? The real, actual majority in every country is silent. As I have tried to explain to you twice, there is an easy gauge of popularity in these countries - at what point does the military turn against the government.

In the meantime, imposing a no-fly zone over Libya is an act of war against a legitimate government - and at the moment they are well equipped, so watch the sparks fly if it happens.

Why do you think the “west” will not turn against Bahrain nor Saudi Arabia, nor Oman, nor Syria, Jordan? Because they are not anti-“west”. But why should a government not be hostile to the west? After all, isn’t democracy all about doing what the people of that country want? Remember Dom Mintoff of Malta? Where’s the analogy? Can you find this hidden connection?

Ghaddafi and his government kept their popularity because of his stance. And because they allowed the Libyan tribes a big say in governing themselves and their local communities - he had no choice, they would have turned on him and deposed him easily. People in the “west” laughed at his self-selected title of “Colonel” and not pompous “General”, without understanding the very good reasons - that he did not want to overshadow his generals, that he wanted to show submission to their greater military skills in order to keep their goodwill and support. And he let them run the forces as they wished.

I’m not supporting any particular government, but their right (Oman, Libya, Bahrain. Saudi Arabia, and others) to continue as long as they have majority support. And they unquestionably do. A few hundred thousand rebels does not constitute a swing of the majority to the opposition, when the population in the millions. You seem to think that the troubles in Egypt are over - let me reassure you that I am not so sure. But I am sure that the poor and ordinary people will see no difference in the long run, and may even suffer worse.

Many of you are not aware of my age or background, or where I’ve lived nor what questions I’ve asked nor what I’ve learnt from local people, nor my attitude nor if I have any inclination to “flavour” my statements, nor with what percentage of my own “feelings”. So up to a point I understand “why” you so strongly reject my viewpoint.

But I will say with a great deal of certainty that I possibly know more about the peoples in those countries than perhaps all of you non-arab people put together,because I have taken the trouble to ask and be informed by the people of those countries. You can always say “people of your own age only do not represent the people” - because you are still young and innocent. I guess you also pooh-pooh’d your dads and grand-dads when they talked about things you didn’t believe. I wonder how many of you know of countries called Palestine, Tanganyika, Abyssinia, Nubia, or recently Yugoslavia. Or the big one called the USSR. You will only find some of them in maps from the 1960s. But if you don’t find them then I guess you will still say I’m talking out of my arse. The joke is that in years to come your own children will say the same to you.

So you never heard of the US contract to buy oil at $7 per barrel. Or of the quarterly visits by a US aircraft carrier to Kuwait, to pick up their quarterly payments for the liberation of Kuwait? One of the carrier’s huge hovercraft passed along the coast near my offices, in plain view. And then went back the same afternoon or sometimes the next day, and the carrier went away again. I didn’t know what was happening until I asked and was told by my boss, a key member of one of the five top families. You maybe think I am just re-inforcing my point with another lie, the Yanks are really all good guys and liberated Kuwait for free, right? I can tell you otherwise. Did you ever even hear of the Chevrolet Caprice that I mentioned, the car that failed to sell in the US? Kuwait bought many thousands. But as it happened it was good enough, was a strong car for the area, had great AC, and gained popularity there - along with the outdated Suburban. So overall it wasn’t a bad thing, unlike the galvanised steel water pipes, which had to be replaced within 10 years because they had corroded - of course.

I can tell you many truths about the countries I have lived and worked in, some are still unbelievable to those who believe the UK and USA are pristine and clean and respectable. I can tell you they are not. But that is business in the real world. How many of you have done business outside your own country? How many of you have led a business?

In contrast I don’t comment heavily on peoples or countries that I know little about. I hope you noticed that.

Just trying to get you youngsters to broaden your outlook on different peoples, and to understand that even a couple of million protesters does not represent a majority in a population of tens of millions if not hundreds of millions.

@ST, many chinese family only have one child, but in non-city area, government allowed second child if the first child not a boy.

Im not say $300 will make people hunger, most of us just live so so. And i note that you only counted the food.

We also need pay taxs (most of tax included in price of every commodities), and fuel and water and electric and phone bills and most you paying. We not living in primitive society.

Well, i reply this just for anwser your question.

Thanks NexOse.

China has many problems to overcome because of the high population, terrain and great distances, and in many ways has set an example for other countries.

Tax is with everyone everywhere. Here we also pay continual tax - tax on earnings, and “Value Added Tax” - VAT - on many of the things we buy, and this becomes tax - on - tax.

There is a problem in comparing foreign currencies and earnings without knowing the cost of food and consumables in that country.

Some time ago we learned that factory workers in China were being paid the equivalent of $30 per month - of course by our standards it is total poverty, but it was enough in local currency to live at a minimum level.

Now it seems China has many new millionnaires too, the largest number of Rolls Royce and Bentley cars is going to China. And with that I think there will be a big problem of inflation - price increases - there?