The Starport
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Starport Blog
  • Knowledge Base
  • The Forge
  • Discord
  • Register
  • Login

[Star Citizen News]Chris Roberts announces new Space Sim "Star Citizen"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Front News
127 Posts 40 Posters 163.3k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    Emmanuel
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #8

    I think it will have the Freelancer elements to it, but thinking that this is probably the most challenging and biggest part, they don’t have it ready yet so they showed the Wing Commander aspect of the game.

    I always wanted to walk on the planets. Not even the planets, just the small area where you land would have been enough, exploring the bars and stuff by yourself. Chris Roberts definitely has that kind of gameplay in mind and it’s gonna take a heck of a lot of time to do it.

    Looking at the trailer the real question that bothers my mind is proportions. Will the universe and its planets resemble reality or will they be scaled like Freelancer for convenience?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • * Offline
    * Offline
    ***M.o.D.***
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #9

    khayman wrote:
    […]

    +1

    and i hope we all won’t get overexcited about this.
    the things that were being mentioned a just a little bit too vague in my eyes. Afaik BP has made a lot of promises aswell and we all know where they ended 😄

    I want to see PvP and third person mouse + keyboard controls 😄
    But nevertheless i think its worth keeping an eye on it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    w0dk4
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #10

    Personally I think this could be the new reference in Space Sims in the making. Roberts already proved that he knows how to make a game that is actually fun yet deep, and now he has the chance to actually make the game he was dreaming about when making Freelancer. Check the stretch goals. If this hits 5 000 000 $ of funding it will have

    • MMO persistent world
    • Singleplayer
    • Freelancer-style moddable private servers
    • Coop/Deathmatch campaign (Wing Commander style)

    I think if he doesnt make the stretch goals he will go with the Wing Commander sub-game and will then try to implement the remaining stuff if he gets enough support. I just hope this totally takes off and he manages to get 5 million + funding… spread the word!

    I dont think this will ever have planet landing scale, but I dont think this is important. In fact, this would be over-the-top complicated to do. I know Infinity tries to do this and is pretty successful at it, but Infinity remains to be vaporware as regards being a playable, complicated online-game (its just a tech demo as of now). The devs at Infinity are thinking about a kickstarter at the moment as well and Chris Roberts might just have stolen the show for them. In any way, Roberts just showed that he is a lot more likely to actually deliver a game than the Infinity guys.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    massdriver
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #11

    w0dk4 wrote:
    Personally I think this could be the new reference in Space Sims in the making. Roberts already proved that he knows how to make a game that is actually fun yet deep, and now he has the chance to actually make the game he was dreaming about when making Freelancer. Check the stretch goals. If this hits 5 000 000 $ of funding it will have

    • MMO persistent world
    • Singleplayer
    • Freelancer-style moddable private servers
    • Coop/Deathmatch campaign (Wing Commander style)

    I think if he doesnt make the stretch goals he will go with the Wing Commander sub-game and will then try to implement the remaining stuff if he gets enough support. I just hope this totally takes off and he manages to get 5 million + funding… spread the word!

    I dont think this will ever have planet landing scale, but I dont think this is important. In fact, this would be over-the-top complicated to do. I know Infinity tries to do this and is pretty successful at it, but Infinity remains to be vaporware as regards being a playable, complicated online-game (its just a tech demo as of now). The devs at Infinity are thinking about a kickstarter at the moment as well and Chris Roberts might just have stolen the show for them. In any way, Roberts just showed that he is a lot more likely to actually deliver a game than the Infinity guys.

    Infinity guys have custom engine while Chris uses Crytek, which means that huge part of funding will go to crytek guys instead of game production.

    Also Infinity stands for complete MMO space engine rather than actual game which will be more flexible solution.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alucard
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #12

    The carrier in the tech demo has “FL02” on it. 😄

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    w0dk4
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #13

    Nice catch 😉

    And I’d rather have Roberts work on the actual game rather than optimizing some shaders where the Crytek guys are certainly better at anyways. Im not saying that the Infinity guys are bad or anything like that, Im just saying that Roberts approach is a lot more realistic. Infinity is a great vision and I will certainly back it as well when the day comes they start their Kickstarter. But I wouldnt be surprised if they would still take another 5 years to actually deliver a game that has only the most basic MMO features.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    FriendlyFire
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #14

    Further, it’s worth pointing out that I very much doubt Roberts has gone for the “indie” funding option where around a quarter of the income goes to Crytek. Chances are they’ve got a more serious agreement which involves a much lower percentage.

    Plus, as w0d said, it’s basically paying Crytek to do what they’re excellent at instead of paying in-house programmers to replicate the same functionality.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    NeXoSE
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #15

    But…. Anyway, we will have new stuff to wait and play. So my opinion… don’t worry too much about it’s Crytek or not.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cmdrsaman
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #16

    Just my two cents, but he made so many promises now that I wonder how many of them he’ll actually fulfill. It’s pretty much a given that they’ll have to find some other investors as well, because crowdsourcing almost certainly won’t turn up five million dollars. As far as I know, no video game on Kickstarter ever hit more than four million - and RSI is doing this on their own.

    We’ll see how much money the initial fundraiser does produce. It should be interesting, because would-be investors will probably base their decision on that too. After all, Chris Roberts doesn’t exactly have a spotless track record: correct me if I’m wrong, but his last game went way overtime and over budget, no? Didn’t deliver the majority of promised features either. Granted, it was a long time ago, but this is a niche genre that we’re talking about.

    Unfortunately, if funding won’t meet the intended goal, the persistent multiplayer / MMO part will probably be the first to go. Developing and maintaining it is more expensive than making a SP game, after all.

    But hey, we’ll wait and see. One more project that might happen is still good news, after all.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hidamari
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #17

    the first player submitted content, will be a Remade, HD Freelancer Eagle/Sabre/Titan.

    imagine one of those with the detail and texture love this game has… with all the cockpit love too… would look so freaking sweet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Timmy51m Historic Supporter
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #18

    The more I think about it, the more the model he speaks about reminds me of black prophecy. I wish he would follow the guild wars model instead, it’s the only free to play model that seems to work.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    FriendlyFire
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #19

    Timmy, the very site says they’re following a model similar to GW2.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Timmy51m Historic Supporter
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #20

    That’s great news. I wish I had the chance to learn more but haven’t been able to access anything other than a screwed up european pledge site for the last couple of days.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    one2many
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #21

    “freelancer 2” only can be Freelancer 2 if there are nomads and jun’ko and trent, if not it can’t be called fl2
    anyway, the graphics look really atractive

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bobthemanofsteel
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #22

    Been burnt way too many times by games like this, so I’m not exactly excited, but I am looking forward to seeing what comes of it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    NeXoSE
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #23

    I also notice nothing about multiplayer.

    I believe this game is a remaking of Starlancer …… And I don’t like military things.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bobthemanofsteel
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #24

    NeXoSE wrote:
    I also notice nothing about multiplayer.

    I believe this game is a remaking of Starlancer …… And I don’t like military things.

    Multiplayer is mentioned quite explicitly, actually.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    NeXoSE
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #25

    Bobthemanofsteel wrote:

    NeXoSE wrote:
    I also notice nothing about multiplayer.

    I believe this game is a remaking of Starlancer …… And I don’t like military things.

    Multiplayer is mentioned quite explicitly, actually.

    Thank you for correct me, i must miss that part. But… i still not like military things very much. Hope i can get something to do when i actually play it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hidamari
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #26

    why do people keep saying things arent a certain way that are clearly mentioned either in the video or in the surrounding media of this project….

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    FriendlyFire
    wrote on global:last_edited_by,
    #27

    They have already said trading and empire-building are all in. Seriously, as Hidamari said, read the bloody descriptions before jumping on the hate train.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Story Mission level requirement
    C
    CommanderArgelo
    0
    11
    52

  • Crash Offsets
    J
    josbyte
    0
    231
    251.4k

  • Capital ships shield collision detection
    C
    CommanderArgelo
    0
    3
    17

  • Dropping a phantomloot cargo from an NPC
    C
    CommanderArgelo
    0
    5
    26

  • Incorrect Shield Value on HUD
    C
    CommanderArgelo
    0
    4
    19

  • @Adoxa - Wheel Scroll plugin improvements
    AingarA
    Aingar
    0
    3
    20

  • Release: Advanced Renderer v. 1.1 beta 1
    S
    SWAT_OP-R8R
    3
    50
    428

  • German Mod Tutorials? 2024 Mod Tutorial?
    S
    SWAT_OP-R8R
    0
    18
    66
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Starport Blog
  • Knowledge Base
  • The Forge
  • Discord