Freelancer Initiative
-
Yes, but clearly not in this way. They still retain copyrights and still get money off every purchase, hence why they wouldn’t like to see some random person start distributing their game for free.
As for the infocards, what’s the point? XML != DLL. Whatever you do, you’d still need another tool to sit between that XML data in the DLL data. At that point, why bother? There are already tools that allow direct modification of DLL files which are way more convenient than a web page (and safer, too).
-
-
If you want, I guess. Personally I just write the DLL infocards directly in FLDev, no need for the CSV parser. If I need to write dozens of guns including INI code, Excel or Google Spreadsheets beat web forms any day.
-
I’ll refrain from discussing the original idea in this topic from now on in public forums, my inbox is always open for those who are interested in helping out in that endeavour, I’d call it more an end-game solution, for now I guess there are other ways of propogating Freelancer in the minds of new gamers.
-
I often wonder how the FreeAllegiance group convinced Microsoft to allow them access to the Allegiance source code myself.
They are distributing a fully functional and fixed version with no fear of Microsoft legal actions.
That is the direction I wish Freelancer could go…
-
I will offer my opinion here, for what it is worth.
I am hugely against the idea of using Torrent site etc for Freelancer. Alot of hard work has gone into promoting Freelancer in the last 24 months by many people here and on sites like SWAT, FLC etc.
Now although Microsoft have removed support for the game, they wont appreciate any torrenting going on, or any individual sites that support it. (Yes I know Torrents already exist).
I would also recommend any sites represented here stay well away from getting involved in this also.
Personal opinion. Shoot me down if you will.
-
Why would you be shot down for expressing an opinion, under normal circumstances I’d agree, as I did buy the game.
I’d just hate to see the game die out, considering there is still much potential. As far as I can see theres never many players on at any time on any of the servers I have seen on the player list, correct me if I’m wrong in that regard.
I can see you’ve done a bit of work about this, maybe its early to be seeing returns on your efforts (and others efforts).
My intent is not to tarnish anyones reputation, I never said I wanted it to be a Starport project or that I required anyones endorsement or approval for it, it was merely an idea.
I’m entitled to express them just as you are, and you have, just wanted to do my part, I just feel that continuing with the way things are this game is going to die (albeit slowly) an unrecoverable death, unless we can get ourselves a few hundred players or so to keep us going while we attract more.
Has anyone thought of Digg? Thats populated by at least 100,000+ people daily.
-
I think you may have misinterpreted my post. Please don’t think I was putting your idea down. Under different circumstances, I would probably be in full support of such an idea.
In the regards to the things I have done. The article I wrote recieved over 7000 views on 3 different sites, and to date I have recieved near 200 emails regarding it. The Twitter account is growing steadily with no maintenance by me what-so-ever. The Feeds are manually added, but after that I leave it. We are now sitting at 103 followers and near around 500 clicks to the sites currently being ‘tweeted’.
But I consider these still only minor achievements in the grand scheme of things. And still want to push things further. And I have the oppurtunity to do so having the contacts now that I didn’t have 2 months previous. But this will wait until after Christmas.
There are plenty of sites similar to Digg. There is GameKicker, which works on the same principal and a few others.
-
@Azureus: I thought about another thing that could be problematic in relation to torrents. I know this may sound like stereotyping, but very often, the people who torrent a game will not really be interested in participating with the community. You’d mostly end up with people going through the SP once or worse, cheaters and hackers.
I’m doubtful we’d gain much ground with this method, on top of the whole thing being effectively “unadvertizable”.
-
Have a bunch of players digg, or whatever your article then out there to the masses, that should be sure to recieve quite a lot more hits, especially if your article contains the twitter info and all that other stuff.
But, I’m still having a crack at updating the vanilla client to include the graphical enhancements and code fixing enhancements and much more to improve the game.
I’m not vain enough to consider my efforts to be a new vanilla as such, but if we all worked on such a project, just modifying the original game to bring it looking and feeling like a modern game, I’m sure we could attract even more players to the game.
Theres various patches to be sure, and many mods, but wouldn’t a centralised vanilla “update” serve to benefit everyone?
I think its about time we fixed all of the problems that are in the game and for all intents and purposes call it “a new vanilla” from which people can base their new mods on.
Of course obvious issues arise, such as who decides what goes in etc, but I think that kind of thing can be settled with voting.
Or at least vote the folks in who have been playing and modding Freelancer the longest who have the games best interests at heart, a sort of community voted high council of Freelancer so to speak.
-
Theres various patches to be sure, and many mods, but wouldn’t a centralised vanilla “update” serve to benefit everyone?
Only those interested in playing playing with mods in the first place - and even disregarding that, what you are suggesting could very well introduce a compatibility nightmare for nearly every server and mod currently in existence.
-
For the mod/patch project, I am working on a thingy more or less.
http://the-starport.net/freelancer/news/article.php?storyid=147
Though, I just work at it every then and then at the moment.
