Freelancer Mod Studio - 1.2

oZed

This is a great utility and hope you continue with its development. I have one suggestion for it though, i would really like the ability to add a single line to multiple entries in an ini file ie. i want to add explosion_arch = battledust to all my weapon entries without going through each entry and adding the line. Anyway, just a suggestion, good luck with this awesome project and ill be looking forward to its final release. BTW i second the keeping a single core version of the utility since loading FL-DEV really takes a long time on my system (and is very agrevating when i acidentally close it). Good Luck

Ozed.

stfx

FriendlyFire wrote:
I know I can’t help firsthand but I guess I can just give up the FLDev source since you’ve already either supplanted or equalled all the features I had planned or already have done. Would be useless to have two apps doing the same thing now wouldn’t it?

I haven’t been able to work on it in months anyways.

That would be great. In what language did you write it? I am particularly interested in the algorithm of ressource dlls.

oZed wrote:
This is a great utility and hope you continue with its development. I have one suggestion for it though, i would really like the ability to add a single line to multiple entries in an ini file ie. i want to add explosion_arch = battledust to all my weapon entries without going through each entry and adding the line. Anyway, just a suggestion, good luck with this awesome project and ill be looking forward to its final release. BTW i second the keeping a single core version of the utility since loading FL-DEV really takes a long time on my system (and is very agrevating when i acidentally close it). Good Luck

Ozed.

That is already possible. All you have to do is to select many entries and change the value in the property view. The value of every selected entry will be overwritten with your new value.

FriendlyFire

VC++ .NET. All the interfacing (INIs, CSVs, DLLs) is in a separate .NET DLL which should be easy to use in C#.

stfx

Finally version 0.9.2 is online which has a 3D universe/system editor implemented.
Download: here
Changelog: here

Version 0.9.2

Added 3D system editor

Added 3D universe editor including display of travel connections using jumpgate (yellow), jumphole (red), both (blue) or a combination of those (gradient color)

Added system legend icons to table editor

Added possibility to hide/show objects in the system editor using the table editor

Added pyramid mesh display for ships and jump gates

Added open system menu in universe display

Improved table editor in general

Fixed incorrect display of document menu if there is no open file at startup

Fixed content and document null bug

Fixed bug with open system editor and no open document

Fixed minor display bugs

Fixed silent update display bug

Fixed undo/redo bug where block will not be shown again after redo

StarTrader

Hello stfx.

I think you have made a very good start for a very useful tool.

Here is some initial feedback if I may…

If you don’t mind to improve it dramatically, would you spend the time to:

1. highlight all the applicable properties for the selected object, or grey out the ones that are not valid for it?
2. add drop-down option lists for all valid properties for the selected object?

This will make it so much faster, if we don’t have to look up the options for each property.

I know this will be a lot of work and very tedious, unless you can create a way to read all properties for each object and all options for each property from all system ini files (and factions) into a database and show those options when the properties for a particular object are clicked in the editor?

That would be absolutely fabulous.

Questions please -
1. Why are New… Mod and Open… Mod… disabled?

2. Universe map - When I double-clicked on a system to select the system ini file for editing from there, FL Mod Studio crashed with message box “A critical error occurred. Do you want to post an issue report? Input string was not in the correct format.”

3. When I opened shiparch.ini, all the sections are shown in Type order, with all [CollisionGroup] sections first, then all [Ship] sections, then all [Simple] sections, so the true file sequence is lost. They should be in line order please so we can see which [CollisionGroup] and [Simple] section is with which [Ship] section?

The same for weapon_equip.ini, sections are listed by type instead of in line sequence. So same change is needed.

And other files have the same problem again.

4. When editing loadouts.ini, for SECRET loadouts (wrecks) can we ensure that those loadouts cannot contain engine, shield, power, scanner or tractor options, because that causes errors?

5. Also in loadouts.ini files, is it possible to have drop-down selection options for weapons and shields so that classes are not exceeded for the hardpoints?

Sorry for suggesting more than you had in mind! I know I am asking for a new FL Explorer with much more - but that’s what we need, and it looks like you can really do it! lol

Many thanks for your good work.

stfx

Thanks, ok here are your answers …

1. highlight all the applicable properties for the selected object, or grey out the ones that are not valid for it?

Oh hey I did not think of that and that would already be possible without the need to convert everything to WPF (see next answer). Can you give me some examples of applicable properties for some objects. Based on what attributes should I seperate them?

2. add drop-down option lists for all valid properties for the selected object?

That was already my plan but I intend to implement it differently than you may think. The tool will scan (one day) every file in the current mod/project. But I did not implement “mod/project management” yet. In order to do it right I would need to do it using WPF but the tool is not fully converted to WPF yet so I would have to:
1. convert the tool to WPF which would result in a better performance but is pretty time intensive
2. implement mod management
3. implement type casting so that you can only enter valid values
4. implement mod scan to get all valid values

As you can see I would have to rewrite and add a lot of code which may or may not happen.

1. Why are New… Mod and Open… Mod… disabled?

Because I did not implement mod management yet … see answer above

2. Universe map - When I double-clicked on a system to select the system ini file for editing from there, FL Mod Studio crashed with message box “A critical error occurred. Do you want to post an issue report? Input string was not in the correct format.”

Sorry stupid typo will be fixed in the next version

3. When I opened shiparch.ini, all the sections are shown in Type order, with all [CollisionGroup] sections first, then all [Ship] sections, then all [Simple] sections, so the true file sequence is lost. They should be in line order please so we can see which [CollisionGroup] and [Simple] section is with which [Ship] section?

Oh I did not know that and it looks like a serious problem. I will think about a way to fix it.

4. When editing loadouts.ini, for SECRET loadouts (wrecks) can we ensure that those loadouts cannot contain engine, shield, power, scanner or tractor options, because that causes errors?

Should be possible if I implement answer 1

5. Also in loadouts.ini files, is it possible to have drop-down selection options for weapons and shields so that classes are not exceeded for the hardpoints?

See answer 2

StarTrader

Thanks stfx.

I will assemble some properties for you asap, it will take time so if anyone else can help with this please do.

Here are the ones for DATA\SHIPS\shiparch.ini - note I’m not sure how to list the fuse = options for the [CollisionGroup] entries…

[Simple]
nickname = (object name)
DA_archetype = (path to damage cap .3db model)
material_library = (path to .mat file)
LODranges = (0, n/0, n, n) - Level of Detail switch distances
MinSpecLOD = (only pilot model = 2, all others not used)
mass = (integer)
hit_pts = (hit points)

[CollisionGroup]
obj = (object name)
separable = (true) - omitted if false (thanks adoxa)
parent_impulse = (0/10/20/60/90/120/160/240/320/500/600/1200)
child_impulse = (1/4/7/10/20/30/50/60/100/150/200/300/400/500/600/700/800/1000/1200/1500/2000)
dmg_hp = (DpXxxx - attachment hardpoint name in ship .cmp file)
dmg_obj = (Damage cap name) - needs a [Simple] entry with same name
mass = (integer)
debris_type = (cap_ship_piece/cap_ship_piece2/debris_normal/debris_small_ship/debris_vanish)
separation_explosion = (explosion_small_ship_breakoff/omitted - mutually exclusive with fuse
type = (Fin/Middle_Wing/Port_Arm/Port_Fin/Port_Side_Panel/Port_Wing/Spoiler/Starboard_Arm/Starboard_Fin/Starboard_Side_Panel/Starboard_Wing/Tail/Top_Fin)
hit_pts = (integer)
root_health_proxy = (true/false)
fuse = (fuse, start, duration - mutually exclusive with separation_explosion - multiple, not sure how to list options
group_dmg_hp = (DpXxxx - hardpoint name)
group_dmg_obj = (Damage cap name)

[Ship]
ids_name = (ship name infocard)
ids_info = (full stats infocard)
ids_info1 = (ship decription infocard)
ids_info2 = (short stats template - always 66608)
ids_info3 = (short stats infocard)
nickname = (ship nickname)
ship_class = (0/1/2/3)
LODranges = (0, n, n, n, n, n)
msg_id_prefix = (gcs_refer_shiparch_atransport/gcs_refer_shiparch_borf/gcs_refer_shiparch_borhf/gcs_refer_shiparch_ctransport/gcs_refer_shiparch_hfighter/gcs_refer_shiparch_htransport/gcs_refer_shiparch_lfighter/gcs_refer_shiparch_stransport/gcs_refer_shiparch_support)
mission_property = (can_use_berths/can_use_med_moors/can_use_large_moors)
type = (FIGHTER/FREIGHTER)
mass = (integer)
hold_size = (integer)
linear_drag = (1)
fuse = (fuse name, duration, at hit points) - multiple entries
max_bank_angle = (10/15/20/25/30/35/40/45/50/55/60)
camera_offset = (height, distance from ship centre)
camera_angular_acceleration = (0.025000/0.035000/0.050000/0.060000)
camera_horizontal_turn_angle = (17/20/23)
camera_vertical_turn_up_angle = (5/10/15)
camera_vertical_turn_down_angle = (20/25/30)
camera_turn_look_ahead_slerp_amount = (1)
nanobot_limit = (integer)
shield_battery_limit = (integer)
hit_pts = (integer)
DA_archetype = (path to ship .cmp file)
material_library = (path to ship .mat file)
material_library = (FX\envmapbasic.mat - can be omitted)
envmap_material = (envmapbasic - can be omitted)
cockpit = (path to ship cockpit ini file)
pilot_mesh = (generic_pilot - can be omitted if pilot not visible)
explosion_arch = (explosion_asteroid_miner/explosion_br_elite/explosion_br_fighter/explosion_br_freighter/explosion_cap_ship1/explosion_co_elite/explosion_co_fighter/explosion_co_freighter/explosion_cv_fighter/explosion_ge_atransport/explosion_instant/explosion_ku_elite/explosion_ku_fighter/explosion_ku_freighter/explosion_large_ship01/explosion_li_elite/explosion_li_fighter/explosion_li_freighter/explosion_no_battleship/explosion_no_elite/explosion_no_gunboat/explosion_rh_battleship/explosion_rh_elite/explosion_rh_fighter/explosion_rh_freighter/explosion_toss_debris_200/shatter_elite/shatter_utility/shatter_utility_small)
surface_hit_effects = (0, small_hull_hit_light01, small_hull_hit_light02, small_hull_hit_light03) - entry 1
surface_hit_effects = (150, small_hull_hit_medium01, small_hull_hit_medium02, small_hull_hit_medium03) - entry 2
surface_hit_effects = (300, small_hull_hit_heavy01, small_hull_hit_heavy02, small_hull_hit_heavy03) - entry 3
steering_torque = (x, y, z)
angular_drag = (x, y, z)
rotation_inertia = (x, y,z)
nudge_force = (30000 - 30000000)
strafe_force = (integer, 2 x nudge_force)
strafe_power_usage = (2 - 5000)
bay_door_anim = (Sc_open/Sc_open bay/Sc_open baydoor/Sc_open dock1/Sc_open door/Sc_pi_elite/Sc_pi_fighter/Sc_pi_vheavy_fighter/Sc_prison_liner/Sc_rh_freighter - name of animation script in ship .cmp if any)
bay_doors_open_snd = (cargo_doors_open/hanger_doors_opening)
bay_doors_close_snd = (cargo_doors_close/hanger_doors_closing)
hp_bay_surface = (HpBayDoor01)
hp_bay_external = (HpBayDoor02)
num_exhaust_nozzles = (same as number of engines in ship .cmp file)
hp_tractor_source = HpTractor_Source
shield_link = (shieldname, HpMount, HpShield01, … HpShieldnn)
hp_type = (hp_gun_special_1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10, HpWeapon01, … HpWeaponnn) - multiple
hp_type = (hp_turret_special_1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10, HpTurret01, … HpTurretnn) - multiple
hp_type = (hp_elite_shield_special_1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10, HpShield01, … HpShieldnn) - multiple
hp_type = (hp_freighter_shield_special_1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10, HpShield01, … HpShieldnn) - multiple
hp_type = (hp_fighter_shield_special_1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10, HpShield01, … HpShieldnn) - multiple
hp_type = (hp_thruster, HpThruster01, … HpThrusternn)
hp_type = (hp_mine_dropper, HpMine01, … HpMinenn)
hp_type = (hp_countermeasure_dropper, HpCM01, … HpCMnn)
hp_type = (hp_torpedo_special_2, HpTorpedo01, HpTorpedonn) - cruise disrupter mount
hp_type = (hp_torpedo_special_1, HpTorpedo01, HpTorpedonn) - torpedo mount
nomad = (true) - present for nomad ships only

adoxa

separable = (true/false)

This is incorrect. Freelancer only tests if it exists, thus separable = false is identical to separable = true. JFLP removes the value altogether, just using separable, which the Studio has a problem with (presumably sees it as blank, so doesn’t write it back). This also applies to autoselect in news.ini and autoplay in the missions.

StarTrader

Thanks for the heads-up adoxa, edited.

Igiss

I’ve just tried the editor. First question - is the 3D editor actually functional? No idea how to move the objects around.

As for the more strategic approach. I’m not sure if many modders have a demand for visual editing of ini files. Some text editors provide collapsible ini file entries for compact view, and using ctrl-f for searching things is something we’re all accustomed to. Implementing an error checker for all ini entries, and for links between those entries… well, could be useful, but it will take a lifetime. Plus, there are pretty good error checkers available around.

Generally, if I were you, I’d concentrate primarily on the 3D system editing part.

Which leads to the next question. Right now you can open and view the system, change coordinates in “properties” and observe the result. There are several drawbacks here: first, you cannot move them in 3D mode (which was already mentioned), second, there are many excessive properties for all objects that are never used (blank) and make it harder to actually find the coordinates.

Also, I tried saving the file with the Mod Studio, and it looks like all the entries for all objects in the system are re-arranged, with changed ini properties order and changed order of objects. I mean… what for would you do that? Freelancer Explorer, with all its flaws, never messed with the code that wasn’t changed (except for adding the line breaks) and placed entries for new objects in the order used in Vanilla FL. With modders accustomed to Vanilla formatting, I don’t think it’s a good idea to change it. For example:

a base in Vanilla starts like that

[Object]
nickname = EW15_11
pos = -66148, 0, 31979
ids_info = 65713
behavior = NOTHING
pilot = pilot_solar_easy
dock_with = EW15_11_Base
base = EW15_11_Base

and base after saving the file in Studio is

[Object]
Archetype = space_police01
Base = EW15_11_Base
behavior = NOTHING
difficulty_level = 18
dock_with = EW15_11_Base
ids_info = 65713
ids_name = 505200

Anyway - just like with Freelancer Explorer, each tool (especially in testing stage) needs me as a system modder to track the code changes that the tool makes - and in this case, tracking changes is hard as hell.

I believe there are a number of really strong features in this new editor - one of them is showing the direction and size of objects in the 3D view. Planet rings, for example - that’s something that can be used for system editing right now (even with the viewer). So, it’s only a suggestion, but why not start expanding in that area? First thing that comes into mind is implementing direction controls for objects like wrecks - so that you could see in 3D view which direction the wreck is exactly facing. If you could add actual models to 3D view - even better, but preformance issues will arise because of that. If it’s done, it must be optional only, with schematic view also available.

So, in my opinion, the primary things to proceed with would be:

Concentrate on systems only, at least for now, to do what FL Explorer can do, and do it better. FL Explorer has good “wizards” to create bases and such, so it would be good to duplicate those, but not essentially.
Make the editor usable for fine-tuning systems in its current stage, which means that it shouldn’t re-arrange the ini entries at all, editing only the part that must be edited. Like, if you change angle of planetary rings, only one line of the ini file is actually changed.
Make selection of objects in 3D view easier. Several ways to do this - make smaller objects within larger ones selectible, creating sortable lists of objects that would allow to group some, for example, to remove all zones from the view, etc.

All I can think of right now.

FLDev: not speaking for everyone, but we at Discovery use it for one specific (and very much needed) task: importing infocard sheets. And since the format that FLDev uses for it is quite convenient, it’s better to make sure that the new tool supports this import as well. But I won’t consider this a high-priority task.

StarTrader

On second look I tend to agree with Igiss.

If you focus on an ini editor the project will be long delayed.

And yes it is totally important to NOT change line order in most files.

Quarks

Igiss wrote:
Freelancer Explorer, with all its flaws, never messed with the code that wasn’t changed (except for adding the line breaks) and placed entries for new objects in the order used in Vanilla FL.

But FL Explorer likes to wipe out commented stuff. Really annoying when testing different values. Also it always makes fields display as debris on the minimap.

StarTrader

Well first let’s see if stfx is in agreement with focussing on the system editor only, then we can help him to construct a definition for the editor’s functions, so that he understands the spec we would like and see what he can do.

stfx - it may be a good thing, and then when that part is done and working if you still wish to continue the ini editor would certainly be useful if you agree, so that the Studio gets additional functionality in stages.

What do you think should be the first priority in that case? It’s your project.

Igiss

But FL Explorer likes to wipe out commented stuff. Really annoying when testing different values.

Never said that Explorer is an ideal tool. Quite contrary, it has its drawbacks. Amd I don’t use comments in systems so I didn’t consider that part.

In any case, I keep the “master” mod files apart from the folder edited by FL Explorer, and apply changes in a selective way. And recommend the same to other system modders.

Also it always makes fields display as debris on the minimap.

Yes, true. But it’s easy to edit manually if you have a table with correct values for varied fields

My goal here is not to praise FLEx but to recommend implementing useful features from that tool into the new one… that’s it.

stfx

adoxa wrote:
This is incorrect. Freelancer only tests if it exists, thus separable = false is identical to separable = true. JFLP removes the value altogether, just using separable, which the Studio has a problem with (presumably sees it as blank, so doesn’t write it back). This also applies to autoselect in news.ini and autoplay in the missions.

Oh I did not know that… fortunately thats easy to change and will be fixed in the next version. If you enter = inside the value you will get the wanted result (separable = ).

Quarks wrote:
But FL Explorer likes to wipe out commented stuff. Really annoying when testing different values.

Is that important? Because the tool does not support it currently as well.

Igiss wrote:
I’ve just tried the editor. First question - is the 3D editor actually functional? No idea how to move the objects around.

As for the more strategic approach. I’m not sure if many modders have a demand for visual editing of ini files. Some text editors provide collapsible ini file entries for compact view, and using ctrl-f for searching things is something we’re all accustomed to. Implementing an error checker for all ini entries, and for links between those entries… well, could be useful, but it will take a lifetime. Plus, there are pretty good error checkers available around.

Generally, if I were you, I’d concentrate primarily on the 3D system editing part.

Which leads to the next question. Right now you can open and view the system, change coordinates in “properties” and observe the result. There are several drawbacks here: first, you cannot move them in 3D mode (which was already mentioned), second, there are many excessive properties for all objects that are never used (blank) and make it harder to actually find the coordinates.

Also, I tried saving the file with the Mod Studio, and it looks like all the entries for all objects in the system are re-arranged, with changed ini properties order and changed order of objects. I mean… what for would you do that? Freelancer Explorer, with all its flaws, never messed with the code that wasn’t changed (except for adding the line breaks) and placed entries for new objects in the order used in Vanilla FL. With modders accustomed to Vanilla formatting, I don’t think it’s a good idea to change it. For example:

a base in Vanilla starts like that

[Object]
nickname = EW15_11
pos = -66148, 0, 31979
ids_info = 65713
behavior = NOTHING
pilot = pilot_solar_easy
dock_with = EW15_11_Base
base = EW15_11_Base

and base after saving the file in Studio is

[Object]
Archetype = space_police01
Base = EW15_11_Base
behavior = NOTHING
difficulty_level = 18
dock_with = EW15_11_Base
ids_info = 65713
ids_name = 505200

Anyway - just like with Freelancer Explorer, each tool (especially in testing stage) needs me as a system modder to track the code changes that the tool makes - and in this case, tracking changes is hard as hell.

I believe there are a number of really strong features in this new editor - one of them is showing the direction and size of objects in the 3D view. Planet rings, for example - that’s something that can be used for system editing right now (even with the viewer). So, it’s only a suggestion, but why not start expanding in that area? First thing that comes into mind is implementing direction controls for objects like wrecks - so that you could see in 3D view which direction the wreck is exactly facing. If you could add actual models to 3D view - even better, but preformance issues will arise because of that. If it’s done, it must be optional only, with schematic view also available.

So, in my opinion, the primary things to proceed with would be:

Concentrate on systems only, at least for now, to do what FL Explorer can do, and do it better. FL Explorer has good “wizards” to create bases and such, so it would be good to duplicate those, but not essentially.

Make the editor usable for fine-tuning systems in its current stage, which means that it shouldn’t re-arrange the ini entries at all, editing only the part that must be edited. Like, if you change angle of planetary rings, only one line of the ini file is actually changed.

Make selection of objects in 3D view easier. Several ways to do this - make smaller objects within larger ones selectible, creating sortable lists of objects that would allow to group some, for example, to remove all zones from the view, etc.

All I can think of right now.

FLDev: not speaking for everyone, but we at Discovery use it for one specific (and very much needed) task: importing infocard sheets. And since the format that FLDev uses for it is quite convenient, it’s better to make sure that the new tool supports this import as well. But I won’t consider this a high-priority task.

I am sorry if I did not make myself clear that the tool does not support 3D position/rotation/scale editing in the viewer yet. But that is actually on my todo list and would not be impossible to implement. But I guess that most users still prefer to enter the values manually since you cant define it that exactly - e.g. I prefer setting it to a “nice” number like 16000 instead of something like 15989.

As for the visual editor for ini files. I agree with you that most modders are used to using a texteditor since they used it until now but the visual editor was implemented with the thought to combine it with typecasting (so that you cant enter a string inside a number property) and drop down options just like StarTrader said. My little amount of time is the result for the current stage. That means I wont drop the visual editor and will not concentrate on systems only. I will try to improve the tool in general.

Of course currently the 3D editor is the feature that most users are interested in so I will probably spent the most time to improve that specific part but I am against the use of usual wizards like in fle. I will think about something like the possibility to jump to entries in other files for the selected object - like bases and so on (any ideas?).

About the order of the saved properties. You are right that modders are not accustomed to this order of properties and it is harder to track the changes from vanilla. But you could save every vanilla file using the studio so you will again have the same order of properties. Well as you may have realized they are somewhat ordered by name so I thought it would be easier to find a specific entry. But it is not a big deal to change it you just have to edit the order of those properties inside Template.xml in the app folder. Well … nevermind I will do that for you and it will be implemented in the next version

As for the direction controls for wrecks. Thats why ships and jumpgates look like pyramids. Because you can see, based on the tip, the direction it is looking to. Tell me if the direction does not represent the one in FL. I am not sure if I can implement the display of real models - we will see about that one.

And yes I will also think about a way to make selection easier. If you have some more ideas how to do that please tell me.

thanks for the feedback

Igiss

stfx, thanks for the reply.

But I guess that most users still prefer to enter the values manually since you cant define it that exactly - e.g. I prefer setting it to a “nice” number like 16000 instead of something like 15989.

Never cared about that one actually - it doesn’t matter, main thing is that the object looks nicely in the system, and this usually requires some coordinate fine-tuning.

That means I wont drop the visual editor and will not concentrate on systems only. I will try to improve the tool in general.

Not asking to drop one of course (it’s needed to edit systems anyway). It’s your tool, you decide

About the order of the saved properties. You are right that modders are not accustomed to this order of properties and it is harder to track the changes from vanilla. But you could save every vanilla file using the studio so you will again have the same order of properties. Well as you may have realized they are somewhat ordered by name so I thought it would be easier to find a specific entry. But it is not a big deal to change it you just have to edit the order of those properties inside Template.xml in the app folder. Well … nevermind I will do that for you and it will be implemented in the next version

Depends on how this will be done. It’s not like there is one unified order of entries for all files…

It’s actually one of the crucial issues - whether files are comparable or not, and whether they are in the same format (even if the order of entries is irrelevant and “format” is purely cosmetic). In fact for some files the order is relevant, and we may not know about all of those cases since we rarely change the order. Within one entry - it’s surely cosmetic and doesn’t affect anything, but readability is important too - if you worked with the ini files of the same format for years, it’s not that easy to adopt reading the entries in a different order.

As for the direction controls for wrecks. Thats why ships and jumpgates look like pyramids. Because you can see, based on the tip, the direction it is looking to.

Maybe highlight the “tip” somehow? I didn’t get where that tip is when I first looked, maybe wasn’t attentive enough…

And yes I will also think about a way to make selection easier. If you have some more ideas how to do that please tell me.

The obvious way is to enable selecting smaller objects “through” aerial zones. So that you select the object you need by clicking on it, even it’s within a zone (zone is easy to select by clicking anywhere else on it). More precise controls for zoom in/out will also help.

Hribek

This tool is nice for positioning objects and finding things in existing systems faster than swimming through the text, even with the current way of selecting objects (you have to peel the zones off to get to them)

What’s more of an issue is that the tool does not support CYLINDER shapes very well (displays boxes and the rotation does weird things), and the rotate = a, b, c entry is not interpreted the same way as in Freelancer. That is probably the most important thing for me, since I would like to use this tool in the future to check patrol path positioning in systems that are not entirely on plane (y=0).

ZetaPirate

I know this is digging up what seems to be an older topic (march?) but I’m a new modder and I was wondering on the status of this program and what the newest available version would be?

Thanks

CK256

The current version is the 0.9.2.0, the link in the first post has been updated, I’ve been using it for a few months now and it has a lot of useful features especially the 3D system view.

Objects can be copied from existing systems and pasted into your new one (be careful with zones if they have exclusions) and the name, location edited as required.

CK256

stfx

If everything goes well there will be a new version comming out pretty soon.

Changes:

Load and save blocks in the original order
Allow to change the order of blocks using drag&drop
Allow sorting the blocks while still retaining the block order
Options will be saved in a unified orderer which is used by Freelancer
Allow to load and save entries which dont have a value (seperable = )
If there are multiple entries for a single option take the last (Freelancer like behaviour)
Implemented octahedron mesh display for LightSource
Fix a crash when opening a system in the universe 3D display when using the english language

Please tell me what you think about =]