O_O LASERS
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
and the syntax is simple and clear once you’ve wrapped your head around it.Haha, good joke… =\
FriendlyFire wrote:
Nova, I think the most important thing you’ll need to understand is how particle effects actually work. I’m afraid there is no such thing as a length for beams.Damn… you blown my brainz better than they were before…
FriendlyFire wrote:
Think about how particle effects behave, how they are created, how they move. What could create length in such circumstances?O.o no idea
And thats what im asking for… i dont understand the syntax, behavour, creating, moving. But i need lasers and asking for help!
Maybe a deal? I will write you in readme as this ale author… What can i give to you? I do all what you wish for ALE from your video and instruction how to get it work…
-
No, that’s not what I want. I care not for fame and fortune (otherwise I wouldn’t be running a site for a near-forgotten 7-year old game ). I want people to UNDERSTAND what they are doing, not just drone out the same tutorials over and over. You don’t make great modders that just follow orders. It doesn’t work that way.
However, I see that you are unwilling to think. If you want to make ALEs, you also need to see how they work conceptually. Plugging in random numbers is not how it should be done! Either you really want to do it and you invest time and effort into the job, or you don’t want to do it, and you should just say so right now to avoid wasting everybody’s time. The question I’ve asked has a simple answer, one that should come to you if you try to think about the concept behind how particle effects work. You’ve worked with 3ds Max already, didn’t you? How would you make a beam effect there?
@Wolfie: By the same token, nobody understands anything because we do not fully understand everything. That’s a false dichotomy. You can know something, master something even, without having perfect and absolute knowledge. We have enough knowledge about ALEs to do almost anything. We probably know over 80% of the format and we can work with it handily enough. I don’t see why you want things to be so black and white. Stop propagating the myths about ALEs being hard and maybe we’ll finally see more ALE editing, which is right now sorely lacking.
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
You’ve worked with 3ds Max already, didn’t you? How would you make a beam effect there?Thin long cylinder, and glow lens effect attached to its material ID:
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9115/69027504.png -
Err, no. Money won’t get you anywhere here.
Seriously, Nova, I think this goes to show I won’t give you the effect. I told you I’d help you learn, but you aren’t willing to learn. A student wouldn’t bribe the teacher into giving him a copy of the homework!
If you’re so blind as not to understand what I’m trying to do, then I’ll just tell you that there’s a similar prototype in SWWT 1.3 and above, attached to the mining laser. I’m sure you can dig up the ALE from there and yes, I allow you to take it apart. I’m not sure about letting you use it directly, however.
I had expected better, though, and you’ll realize it’s flawed on many levels.
-
Well no, because you haven’t answered using particle effects. ALEs are particle effects. You have emitters - sources that create particles - and appearances - how the particles look like. Then you have fields - things that affect how particles behave. All three have parallels within Max: emitters and appearances are described by particle effects, while fields are space warps.
The rest works just the same. You have settings you need to tweak to give the particles the appearance you desire. I would in fact bet that the original developers used 3ds Max or something fairly similar to first design their particle emitters. The values inside the ALEs aren’t clean enough to be manual work, so they had to have some form of visual editor.
I ask again: how would you do a beam in 3ds Max using strictly particles and space warps?
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
Those aren’t beam weapons, they’re just elongated single shots. In beam_effects.ini, make some code like this:[BeamSpear] nickname = put_your_name_here tip_length = ; Put a large number there tail_length = ; Put a large number there head_width = ; Play with this, makes the beam wider core_width = ; Play with this, makes the beam wider tip_color = ; RGB color core_color = ; RGB color outter_color = ; RGB color tail_color = ; RGB color head_brightness = ; Play with this, makes the head stuff more apparent trail_brightness = ; Likewise, makes the trail more apparent head_texture = ; Can be star or ball trail_texture = ; Can be thin or wide flash_size = ; Increase to make a big flash when you fire the weapon
this is actually all you need. i got effects ofc not as great as the ones in FF’s video, but far enough for my current purposes:
i have the tip length equal with tail length and core width (and comparably small), a huge core length, head width small, the sec_core width even a quarter of the core width, a star head texture, a wide trail texture and a flash size of three times the core width.
{right click - show image for full resolution, ofc} -
Anyone else thinking this?
OR is that just me.
-
Im stayin outa this one now… i made the Nova sad……
-
Any “beam” weapon made through beam_effects.ini is fail, because this “beam” is only a real beam when you shooting in one direction.
The eft_muzzle_flash ale method gives the real beam, but there’re some bugs like beam passing through objects or shooting angle. Anyway it is better than ini method
-
whether you ever will get it or not, there is no perfect beam method. even in FF’s video the only reason you saw an entire beam, was the slow motion of the gun and a high refire rate. you can see it on the energy bar (knowing form the guns list, that only one weapon fires).
-
Gisteron wrote:
whether you ever will get it or not, there is no perfect beam method. even in FF’s video the only reason you saw an entire beam, was the slow motion of the gun and a high refire rate. you can see it on the energy bar (knowing form the guns list, that only one weapon fires).Refire rate doesnt matter in this method because the particre is invisible, and ray is just a flash
-
If you want a real REAL laser do a 300,000,000 m/s with a very high fire rate like 0.000001 (in the ini) laser, and don’t forget do a big life time!