New Renderer (OpenGL 3.3)

Glossiness is just the opposite of roughness, so if you invert the texture / value it means the same. In you picture the value of 1 glossiness is 0 roughness and 0.1 glossiness is 0.9 roughness. There might be some differences how some BRDF formulas treat those values, though. So depending on the light model, the same roughness value can look different.

Your reflection RGB texture is also a way to do it (actually I had it included in my shader), but I came to the conclusion that it is easier just to use one base colour texture for everything and do the rest with the greyscale textures / material parameters. This also saves memory and bandwidth.

Metalness just defines how much of the reflection is based on the color texture. If it is 0 the reflection will just be pure white colour like plastic.

If you find a case where the material can not be recreated with my current setup I can adapt it.

Fresnell is only part of today’s lightning models. So yes it is included, but it is only one term of the whole equation. If you really want to know the whole model, look for the GGX stuff, which even blender uses.

You can imagine the metallness as a blend between white texture and the base colour texture. The more it becomes zero, the more the base colour for the reflection is going to be white. Imagine a billiard ball. The reflection is always white no matter what colour it has. So metalness is 0. If you choose a golden colour as base colour texture you will get colour shifts etc. when you set metalness to 1. If it is zero it only will have white reflections and it will look like plastic with gold colour.

So it’s been a while. I was able to reverse quite a bit more and also could integrate it into the shadow rendering. This means some big performance wins plus some other benefits.

Here is a video with the current state: http://www.flnu.net/downloads/fl0210.mp4

Notice, that the moving shadow at the beginning would not have been possible before, since it is offscreen. Also I would not get about 100fps, it was more around 40.

Also currently there is no lighting attenuation. I need to somehow integrate the curves FL allows you to customize.

I am still fighting a bit with the coordinate system FL uses, so this is one blocker. But all in all this is a huge progress, so there is not that much left to do now.

Hehe, thanks!

Here are three other videos:
http://www.flnu.net/downloads/fl0310.mp4
http://www.flnu.net/downloads/fl0310_2.mp4
http://www.flnu.net/downloads/fl0310_3.mp4

I am very pleased with the current look and will try to keep the direction. Tell me what you guys think. Are there still problems with the look? Or is it perfectly fine? Better than fine?

I know what you guys mean. You are talking about the well known “feature creep”. While it might look that way, there is actually a goal I had (and still have) for the first release:

• Good looking shadows
• Good rendering quality so it does not look artificial
• A (somewhat acceptable) material system
• Acceptable performance
• No problematic bugs and enough polish for release

For the current state only the last one is open now. So as you can see there is quite a large progress already made.

Stuff I have on my list for after release:

• More lights, especially make running lights real lights
• Add bloom support (currently there is only exposure control)
• Automatic exposure control (from Valve HL2 paper)
• More baked in reflections so that e.g. nebula not in the starspheres are also reflected
• More performance optimizations
• … (here you can add literally endless stuff which you could do)

@Moonhead:

I intend to make it a mod so in the end everyone can use it. I am thinking about to exclude mods who stole stuff from others, so that they can learn the hard way why stealing is not good. Why should I respect their work if they don’t respect the work of others. I am still open for feedback on this, though.

At first I will release it for our mod only, so problems can be found more quickly. After a while I plan to create a standalone mod on Moddb with only the graphics enhancements for others to use. Hopefully FL will live a bit longer that way.

As for the files: The models in the videos are from vanilla FL. They just use height and normal maps. I upscaled the textures using a self build and trained neural net plus some automatic post processing. Regarding the engine: Basically I replaced the end of the rendering pipeline from FL with my stuff. So maybe its half a new rendering engine. Some stuff still gets just passed through.

I did some tests with eigos and it looks like we have a usable workflow for exporting stuff and use it with my new rendering system. Here is a video from an asteroid eigos created: http://www.flnu.net/downloads/flroid02_4.mp4 . It uses height, normal, roughness and metalness maps.

It seems like everyone is happy with the way the rendering looks now (me included), so I won’t touch that anymore as far as I am able to.

Edit: Replaced the video with a one where the shadows aren’t bugged due to wrong bias.
Edit2: After some map and parameter tuning: http://www.flnu.net/downloads/flroid02_8.mp4

Thanks!

I was able to reverse the list of asteroids which are about to be rendered and integrate it into the shadow rendering. Also I now automatically generate the necessary TBN data for normal maps etc. on asteroids, because FL does not support saving them into the models.

The result can be seen in this video: http://www.flnu.net/downloads/fl1011.mp4

Costs a lot of FPS currently despite of instancing, so improving it is the next step.

Thank you, I really like the look, too!

@Treewyrm: Thanks for the hints, but I know that. The problem is, that FL does not support more than two texture coordinates when rendering asteroids. So the only other option would be to load the model yourself instead of letting FL do it. This is an option for the future, since you also only can use one material, so it would be an improvement. For normal models, the TBN data already is stored into additional texture coordinates.

While I did some internal progress, here are the latest results of my texture upscaling attempts:

As you can see this takes the game to a whole new level. Some example videos are here:

http://www.flnu.net/downloads/FL2411.mp4
http://www.flnu.net/downloads/FL2411_2.mp4

Keep in mind that the material settings are not tweaked yet, so there is still room for improvement. Currently there is only one different one for glass. The rest uses the same one where I quickly tested some values and chose the best looking. If you have a different taste you could make all reflections super smooth etc.

You first need to undo the dds compression. The textures above are done with ESRGAN and pretrained models (two steps, undo dds first and then upscaling). There are quite extensive lists of models you can find on the net. I will try other networks next (e.g. the one you suggested), but the current results are quite impressive. There are tools for ESRGAN which allow alpha upscaling, although the one I tested (IEU) only worked for one texture, not for mass conversion. I did not have time yet to debug that.

Here is the texture upscaled with the same method used in the videos: http://www.flnu.net/downloads/liberty2_1024.png

I did not have any problems with cuda, everything worked fine. But the chip in my laptop is not that old (maxwell). You also could use cpu only, although that sadly is quite slow.

If you get better results, let me know!