Mission Impossible - Cargo Extending
-
A closed-source alternative to FLHook.
-
There is also no free download since it costs money.
-
Well, there is a demo as far as I know but it’s restricted (not all features, 2 players on the server max) and invite-only last I checked.
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
Well, there is a demo as far as I know but it’s restricted (not all features, 2 players on the server max) and invite-only last I checked.^ That sucks!
So whats better? FLAC of FLHook?Edit: I googled FLAC and it says its a kind of an audio codec.
Check it out: http://flac.sourceforge.net/ -
Wrong one… Free Lossless Audio Codec (FLAC) vs FreeLancer AntiCheat (FLAC).
And there’s no “better”, just different. What’s better, a sports car or a luxury car?
-
I googled FLAC and it says its a kind of an audio codec.
Check it out: http://flac.sourceforge.net/FAIL detected
-
Linky Eagle Utopia FLAC
To quote the Blurb
Our software is not publically availalbe, copies are only provided to experienced server operators and their affiliates
-
Im sorry… but am i the only one who thinks making $$ of FL is a big bad red flag?? For fracks sake… for most of us… its a hobby!! but yet agian the best and most helpfull app is resticted… and made to pay for…
I think it stinks… but then im a realist… and mostly everything stinks (lolz)
-
Well it’s all moot as Eagle is giving up FL. Alphawolf is dealing with it all these days and he’s the man to talk to about improving FLAC. While i agree making money from FL is not good, fact is there is a choice here.
1. It’s an addon for FL you can pay for, not part of the original code
2. It adds features that are unique to the server software
3. You can always use something else like FLHook
4. FLAC isn’t the only other popular addon for FL that people pay for, there’s also Milkshape.On a side note note, if you people actually use Google properly and type “Freelancer FLAC” then Eagle’s forum is the first hit.
-
@Xarian: Youre right! No one makes money of Freelancer mods today.
@Gibbon:
FLAC isn’t the only other popular addon for FL that people pay for, there’s also Milkshape.
Milkshape is not an addon to Freelancer. Its a universal 3D program which is easy to make plugins to, and has all the popular games formats alredy plugged in. It wasn’t made for Freelancer.
-
Don’t read me wrong here… FLAC is pretty awesome from what i’ve seen it do for others servers… I just feel it wrong to make money from modders/community’s in general…
However… don’t get me started on ms3d…. that’s just a plain wrought when there’s blender… and nothing for freelancer when almost every other format is well covered by some sort of free converter/program…
-
Yeah, it’s pretty awesome to take the FLHook sourcecode, rewrite it in C#, add some nice features to it and sell it for money (without sharing anything).
Just my few words about FLAC.
-
“Yeah, it’s pretty awesome to take the FLHook sourcecode, rewrite it in C#, add some nice features to it and sell it for money (without sharing anything).”
I’m sorry but you have no idea about FLAC from the statement above.
Firstly, I have access to the source code and it is not a rewrite of FLHook in any sense. As far as I can see it’s a full build from the ground up. It also is not all done in C#. The hooks and anti-cheat are C++, the user interface and plugin interface are C#.
Secondly, for some people to spend time on a project it costs them to do so. Eagle is a full time developer as far as I am aware, the same as myself, and time spent on one project takes time away from another project which may be a paying one, as well as time away from family. The donation that is required to obtain a license also contributes to the support he provided which was to a fairly professional degree.
Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that the scenario with FLAC is one that everyone should appreciate or agree with. I am saying that someone putting hard work into something and asking for recompense in doing so is not WRONG, it’s just different to the open source FLHook approach. I don’t think that it needs slandering either simply because the creator of a software package either wants or needs recompense not only for the work they do but their time and effort in supporting the software.
If you want to talk about it without slandering, and with an open mind, I’m happy to do so. If not, my comments end here.
Apologies to the original poster, this appears to be going off-topic. FriendlyFire is correct about the approach that FLAC takes to cargo pods for player ships.
-Alpha
-
Indeed, please get back to the original topic guys. I know many here don’t appreciate FLAC (and I honestly feel like this too), but this is not the topic to speak about that.
What I can tell is that the stuff FLAC does can be done with FLHook. I have it on my todo list.
-
Crazy wrote:
Yeah, it’s pretty awesome to take the FLHook sourcecode, rewrite it in C#, add some nice features to it and sell it for money (without sharing anything).Just my few words about FLAC.
One word, bollocks.
-
Do we talk about FLAC and making money or do we talk here about the possibility to create cargo container attached to player ships filled with cargo?
-
Skotty. wrote:
Do we talk about FLAC and making money or do we talk here about the possibility to create cargo container attached to player ships filled with cargo?Both
(Captain Obvious to the rescue)Maybe let’s get all off-topic posts(including mine) deleted to save this topic?
-
Apart from being able to do this in FLAC, i don’t know another way to get it working properly. For npc’s it’s easy to enable without any sort of hack or addon, just not for player ships.
-
I remember Chips’s “Player-mountable cargopod economy” thing.
It’s not that exactly, but still kinda walkaround. Should be in the archive??
-
Argh’s toolkit has it as well if i remember right, all scripted, came across it while i was looking for something else
18/36