Lets sattle it up between us

[Huor]

No Sizer, i dont want to push anything. Actually its the TSP admins decision and stuff to deal with it. I am not questening here anything.

I just dont like the behaviour of a community to kick at him whilst he is already down. Regardless of what he has done. He must not be treated the same way in return. As i am also a member of this community i just can voice my mind about it - as everyone else may too.

Well i am not for closing this thread but for leaving it as it is. People might get offended and we dont want to make a mountain out of a molehill

[Timmy51m]

What…No one listens to me? Screw you guys, I’m out of here then.

[Sushi]

Kuze wrote:
IMO time to turn the key and close this topic

Nah, it’s all good. This is still by far a tame topic and I see no need to close it yet.

@Timmy: lol

[Chips]

Huor wrote:
I just dont like the behaviour of a community to kick at him whilst he is already down. Regardless of what he has done. He must not be treated the same way in return.

scratches head

You’re mis-representing Is it intentionally done?? I don’t know… giggles at provocation

To clarify - how many registered members are there here? How many are posting in this thread, and then how many have actively “kicked him whilst he is already down”.

One or two people, if even kicking him whilst he can’t reply, doth not a community represent! So no, it’s not a “community” behaviour in the sense of the Starport. It is one or two individuals.

As for being treated the same way in return? Again, not sure I quite honestly understand what you infer. Are you saying you’re not allowed to voice an opinion upon the questionable, or even disgusting, behaviour exhibited by someone if they’re not able to respond?

It’d kind of mean no discussion of any event, or incident, in the history, and future, of the entire world…unless all parties are present.

Can I no longer call Hitler a douche?

[Thaddeus]

Chips wrote:

Can I no longer call Hitler a douche?

@Chips: Thanks for proving Godwins law,

no offense, but always makes me lol

and as such, maybe this has gone on long enough, time to move on….

[Chips]

Thaddeus wrote:

Chips wrote:

Can I no longer call Hitler a douche?

@Chips: Thanks for proving Godwins law,

no offense, but always makes me lol

and as such, maybe this has gone on long enough, time to move on….

giggles

It honestly seemed like the least likely candidate to offend anyone

However, methinks you need to read the law once more - as thou art referring to it wrongly

in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably criticizes some point made in the discussion by comparing it to beliefs held by Hitler and the Nazis.

I’m in the clear whew

[Thaddeus]

lol, all I remember is that the longer the thread continues the chance of the words being used increases at an exponential rate.

[Chips]

Thaddeus wrote:
lol, all I remember is that the longer the thread continues the chance of the words being used increases at an exponential rate.

I quoted a relevant piece of Godwin’s Law from Wikipedia to correct an incorrectly applied assertion!
It would have been hard to clarify without the quote…

Yeah, I’m passing the hot potato of mentions back to you sucker!

[[Black_Legion]Zeus]

On a much more riveting note:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BM0WHFCNSlA

You know you want to, Ruppet.

[IrateRedKite]

Wait what.