Offset requests - ship spinning & docking speed
-
No idea about the spinning, sorry, but here’s the docking (and launching) speeds. (1.1 offsets only.)
common.dll 050527 1.0f = relative speed after launching (planet) ~adoxa common.dll 06DE13 0.5f = relative speed after launching (station) ~adoxa common.dll 18BDB8 18f = docking speed ~adoxa -
isn’t there a difference between launching from a station or from a planet? launching from planet the speed factor is 1.0.
curious, what would it look like, if the relative speed on launch is higher than 1.0? would you then fly with a velocity higher than max speed of your engine?
-
@Gisteron: Yeah, that’s right. I’ve updated the list with both offsets. No, there are tests to ensure it doesn’t go over 1.
@foxUnit01: I was sorry because I didn’t look into it. Don’t even know where to start. Can I use the “Realistic Battleship Mod (cheap)” that comes with FLMM for testing? How do I then cause the spin? Do nudge_force or the inertia values in the sur have any effect?
-
Well, if at all possible, take a big ship and try to get hit by an NPC (try sitting in front of a tradelane, dock, or somewhere else they frequent). Having a player collide with you should trigger a spin as well. The Realistic Battleship Mod will probably do the trick, though I’ve never used it.
Edit: Also, it’s fair to note this is a multiplayer-only thing. None of the ships suffer any spinning issues at all in singleplayer (since full physics are enabled - you can even drag an NPC around in your cargo bay in SP)
-
NPCs will never spin around if a player or other NPC flies into them. The player won’t do that too, but just in SP! The NPC will do it in SP and MP.
It seems like there is something like “full” and “half” collision. The player has this “half” collision just in MP, everything else is everytime “full” collision.Until this is fixed I can tell you to set the first value of rotation_inertia of big ships to 1% of the first value of angular_drag (x-axis), because the ship just spins around x-axis.
Steering_torque needs to get reduced at the first value to rebalance the faster speed (because the “drag” of rotation_inertia not noticeable anymore).With 0,01 it moves not and spinning is very very slow. Autopilot is relativ stable because just one axis has reduced rotation_inertia.
-
No, this is very bad advice and will cause severe handling problems.
See this:http://forums.seriouszone.com/showthread.php?55250-Tutorial-ship-handling
-
This is pretty much the solution 88 Flak has in place currently. However, it still has that annoying autopilot wagging that makes any autopilot unusable, particularly with Flak’s camera look-ahead used for Capital Ships (so you can steer and shoot at the same time).
Here’s my personal notes on ship handling:
Class Steering Coefficient Base Steering 4.0 1.0 PLF 3.2 0.8 LF 3.2 0.8 HF 2.4 0.6 VHF 1.4 0.35 FR 1.2 0.30 Transport (L) 0.4 0.1 SC (L) 0.4 0.1 LC/WP (L) 0.2 0.05 Station (L) 0.1 0.025 Drag / Inertia Constants Small: 50000, 50000, 50000 (anti-spin factor: 4) Large: 500000000000000, 500000000000000, 500000000000000 (anti-spin factor: 8) The drag constant is multiplied by the steering amount in the table above to work a value of steering_torque The drag constant is divided by the antispin factor to work a value of rotation_inertia Player-flown (te_ prefix) Large Capitals and Stations should have X-axis rotation_inertia use anti-spin of 500 and X-axis steering_torque divided by 8 -
StarTrader wrote:
No, this is very bad advice and will cause severe handling problems.See this:http://forums.seriouszone.com/showthread.php?55250-Tutorial-ship-handling
I read your tutorial. 10% of the angular drag is to much! It won’t affect the ship! It will still spin around like a carusell.
-
No.
If it’s less than 10% you will get the wagging on autopilot.
If it’s more than 20% the ship will spin like a top.
It is not perfect between these two values but a lot better.
The problem is also compounded by the inertia values in the sur file- I haven’t investigated those to find the effect.
There is also an elasticity parameter in contents.ini that will affect collision rebounds, but again I’ve not done limit investigations on that either.
Don’t forget the FL physics engine was not fine-tuned, it’s unfinished. It was not tested with large ships because DA didn’t put any in. Now we put in big ships we have hit these problems.
Maybe adoxa can find a tweak?
-
Yes I know about that autopilot problem, but if you just put the first value of rotatin inertia to 1% of the first angular drag value it works good without fast spinning.
10% is to much! -
What do you mean, the 1st value (X) only?
And the others to what?
-
The ship is just spinning around it’s X-axis. So you just have to change the X-value of rotation_inertia to 1% of the angular_drag x-value.
Y and Z axis are not necessary to be changed.
-
Gravedig
Time to rehash this. While the current patch method works, you really lose the the proper “capship” feel while turning (ie. huge massive hulking feeling while trying to get your ship to move). Has anyone looked into this any further?
-
Bump
-
Wut, fox!?
-
FriendlyFire wrote:
Wut, fox!?!
-
I have some vague memory that Argh solved this… But he gave all the ships totally different stats, so I wouldn’t know if his solution could be implemented in just about every mod.
Besides, you would have to find his toolkit, version 1.2 iirc… In 1.3 he went over the top and had removed all light equipments because they caused bugs.
Anyway, the trick, iirc, was to make those ships incredibly heavy, and adjust all other stats to also keep them pilotable. But I was never really interested in that part of the game, so I don’t remember much, and could even be wrong too.
He was a pioneer in many things, Argh… I still use [my adaption of] his xml based modding method.
