.obj -> .sur converter

Thanks Cata123, I know, and there are of course other ways to do this too.

But we need a tool that will do all of this, because of the time the other ways take.

Since using this sur maker, I’ve come across a error that I don’t understand. When ships run into each other, there is a large amount of lag or the game crashes all together. The same happens in mission against the ships. Here they are if someone would look into it for me. Note: They use vannila weapons.

Alucard, do your surs use the Hpid hardpoints section? If so, you’ll need to remove them or you get that lag you’re describing. FW:ToW had a similar problem.

Schmackbolzen wrote:
No, he is not using the section. I was about to recommend the opposite, like Gibbon posted to add HpMine01, HpCm01 and HpThruster01. The question still is, which HpId is needed to avoid crashes, which is the whole purpose why I added this feature for now. The goal still is to read them from a .cmp and add the corresponding simple geometry.

You also should test collision for each ship with a vanilla ship (if you have not done so yet) and report back. That would make things easier to pinpoint.

These are cap ships, so they don’t have a mine, thruster, or countermeasure. I am not following on “The goal still is to read them from a .cmp and add the corresponding simple geometry.”

Here is what I have done.

I have ran/shot into them with a vannila ship. Full collision, no problems there. They move fine till they run into another ship using a sur from your builder. They vannila shoot at them fine as well. I have made more surs for fighters and have the same problem.

I’ll try and add the hpid’s to the sur builder for the fighters, but for the caps, I kinda lost on what to do.

The point Sushi was making is that you should only add HpMine01, HpCm01 and HpThruster01 (obviously numbering as many as required if you have more than one of those). Adding others was the cause for our lag issue at least.

Thank you Schmack, very much appreciated.

it’s great !

Looks sweet mate. Thanks for your great work.

Woo! That looks epic!

Shiny

A very big “Thank You Schmack” for You
It’s Outstanding

Many questions, few answers (yoda^^^)

If you looking for a ship with more parts and big parts, take a look at the Atlantis City model ( there are few on the net )
I use an atlantis city that a friend have modeled, and your tool crash if the milkshape DX tool indicte more than 10 000, if i take down the count below 9000- 10 000, your tool make a good SUR.
Don’t know if it helps you.

Good luck

I think the most important point here is that the tool should first of all handle vanilla models and create surs for them as perfectly as possible, because many custom models are poorly made, exceed the maximum poly counts, and have non-standard naming of parts and groups.

Many large custom models have been “cobbled together” from two or more cmp files. This is not a good criteria to judge or debug the tool.

Once it operates seamlessly on large vanilla surs (there are many battleships and landscapes etc) then it can be used against custom models and if real bugs are found (not due to imperfections in the model) and can be reproduced, they might be fixed.

For me it looks very good. Understandable options.

Just don’t ask about the Static and Moveable thing. It’s nearly the same but Vanilla seems to make a difference between static and animated multipart groups.