.obj -> .sur converter

Integrated mass convert works too really and would perhaps be more accessible; I was just looking for the simplest solution on your end. If you want to do a full UI for it, go for it!

In any case, I perfectly understand your point and thank you for releasing this at all. I was merely asking since it wasn’t mentioned since I pointed it out the first time around.

Well I am willing to give you access to my code if you want code for auto-reducing polygon count. It’s mainly built upon point distances, point clouds and max point spacing. I may just work on the sur converter again and rework it to output simple meshes in .X format. Kinda wished I had made it automatically adjust the spacing by the bounding radius of the specific sub-part of the cmp, probably would have fixed the missing model pieces problem.
Anyways, thanks for answering.

When I used the Mesh reduction in MilkShape it’s not been very successful and warps the shape too badly to reduce the polycount significantly.

I’ve always created convex parts in the modeller (MilkShape’s Convex Hull tool or 3DS Max’s Havok tools) and then run those through the sur process.

I love that sur tool you made LS, for me it’s awesome seeing as I don’t have a community to worry about. I’ve been playing my single player mod for months now and never had a crash related to any sur your tool made, and every ship is using an sur made by your tool. I think I’m getting away with it because I don’t have any cm or mine launchers outside of the sur and they’re all single mesh models. Thanks man!

One day when I’m not feeling too lazy I might give this one a try lol.

Actually just was just posting an idea that could have solved one of the problems the sur builder had which was not building reduced meshes for parts of the model. Mesh reduction is entirely possible for any model using the inside/outside polygon check. I just meant that I should have made the vertices spacing check auto-adjust according to the bounding box or bounding radius of the model instead of using a single user specified value.

No offense to your tool, you actually got it working were as I did not. I may work on it again to finally complete the tool as it should have been in the first place to output files for my game. I doubt I will finish it for FL since I don’t understand the bits section (the BSP tree stuff) and I don’t see any reason to compete with your tool nor would I want too.

Lazy people like me really wish you would LS!

I can’t get to grips with this tool of yours Schmack.
Converting the cmp for my average fighter to an .obj then using directx tools to reduce the model as far as it can go without falling apart still leaves me with an sur of over 200kb, which i guess is bad news. Looking at vanilla sur’s that’s way more than a fighter should have.

How many kb is too big for FL to handle? Can I get away with these 200kb files or is it a case of having to make new models to make the sur file from, cos I can’t be arsed to do that, way too lazy and too little time lol.

If only there was some tool that would give me a simple outline of the fighter mesh!

Schmackbolzen wrote:
If you check “Only use the outer convex hull as collision mesh” my tool does the same as the tool from LS (but a lot faster).

200kb should be ok for today’s machines. Also the ones generated with the new version should be smaller. If you don’t have big ships you don’t need that much detail so I only would recommend not to use the outer convex hull for bigger ships.

Well it’s all good then, nice one man!

Since there is no tool out there for other games which automatically builds a collision mesh I doubt you will get around building them yourself or accept the bigger file size. Or just use the outer convex hull.

Well there is somthing you can use out there. There is the Havok Content tooll for 3ds max that can specifically make collision meshes by wraping the meshes in your scene.

For 3ds again there is also the PhysX plugin, this does the same thing.

One is better than the other at making working meshes. And one is better because it will wrap the groups in your scene automatically. But the other one would wrap a 1 mesh round the whole model and the only way to get round this is by selecting each group individually and do it over and over.

Both tools work great though, it’s what i use for making any hitbox for FL.

all you have to do is export the final product as a obj and run it through the converter.

Or maybe i am just misunderstanding the question?

Schmack, yes would you please explain what this setting does “Only use the outer convex hull as collision mesh”?

I’m not clear on it yet either. Thanks

I think it does the following (based on the comment that it’s good for small objects):
If you have a small asteroid and you use automatic hull generation of it (just by not creating a convex hull by hand), only the outer, convex hull that every sur file has (normally used for detection of the sur) is used for the collision.
Means: Autosplice creates a lot of single sur meshes. The convex hull around it just “overwrites” these single sur meshes. Means you just have 1 convex mesh, wrapping the whole model.

Thanks Skotty,

OK so this is the “shrink-wrap” single-part surs the old exporter made then?

Thats a good comparison. You just have 1 convex mesh around the model.

Got it, thanks.

If this has already been discussed, My apologies.

I have been using the msConvexTool.dll for convex surface creation recently, the only version I could find(The ver w/the popup window) and I have a question for your program. I always check the box for static for each group that was made by the convex tool, and use automatic on all. Does Automatic mean XYZ of the center of the model, (root) or does it refer to the XYZ=0 of each group made?

Fus

It is always the center of each single group.

Skotty. wrote:It is always the center of each single group.

TY Skotty. If that is the case, if I want the XYZ=0 being the center of the sur model and not each group, what settings should I use? I use the setting of groups=1 in the CMP exporter, and want to make sure that XYZ=0 of the sur file’s model is the same.

Side thought:
If I export cmp group=1 and use multiple groups to make the convex shapes for my .sur that gets exported to obj, even tho I label each group name the same as it’s source with the _lod1 extension instead of the _convex that gets defaulted to, Do I have to regroup all my sub-components into one group before the export to obj? Or can I leave them as is?

Fus

The best way to use Schmackis sur conveter is in combination with P1p3rs CMP exporter, because both use the same center point calculation. If you use the old CMP exporter, the standard center will be 0. Schmackis sur converter won’t move any part, so just leave it where it is.

For the sur, leave EVERY convex group single. Just give all sur groups that belong to the same CMP group the same name.
You have to name the sur group exactly like its cmp group, so everytime add the _lod1 to the end (like you can read them out of your FIX file).
If you use multiple sur groups for a non root group, it may happen that the group gets another center point for its “secundary” group (= the group of the destroyed, cutted off part). In this case set the manual center point of the FIRST sur mesh entry of this group with the negated value of the FIX value of the CMP group. The manual center override will always be added to the automatic center, no override.

It may be that I didnt answer your question on a way you wanted. I really have some problems understanding your questions.