Lets sattle it up between us
-
Posting drama is a lot easier than making a model But your point is taken.
-
Everyones opinion is anytime welcome in a community. Nevertheless annoying him or insult him - without he has any chance for defence is what i would say unfair treatment. You all had a lot of occasions to do that in the other threads and it has happened there already - or not - I didnt followed everything.
I just dont find it OK to talk here about him “in a bad light”, “making fun out of him” as the men was or is already disarmed.
Its like kicking someone who is already left gutted.
-
AAAAAACTUALLY
Post #9 in this thread is when PB was no longer able to post. So, taking that into account… no one said really much of anything about PB after that. Most of the posts fall into 2 categories -
Cat A) the WTF Just Happened Posts
Cat B) The Huor Lets Make A Big Deal Out Of Nothing PostsNow, compare what’s happening now to what’s happened with PB over the last few months, and this is a flea bite. There’s no grievances here. In fact, looking at the situation, none of your statements have any grounding in fact, Huor. Go ahead and look after post #9. Everything after is commenting on the situation and chain of events (aside from Timmy’s post… but no one listens to Timmy).
Essentially, you’re taking something here that is really rather small, and attempting to blow it all way out of proportion. Now, I agree that attacking a defenseless person is generally wrong. That’s why I’ve refrained from saying anything in this thread related directly to PB after he was forcibly ejected by Cheese.
Which forces me to ask the question - Is there some other reason why you’re pushing this issue? 'Cause, as it stands, there is no issue to push.
-
No Sizer, i dont want to push anything. Actually its the TSP admins decision and stuff to deal with it. I am not questening here anything.
I just dont like the behaviour of a community to kick at him whilst he is already down. Regardless of what he has done. He must not be treated the same way in return. As i am also a member of this community i just can voice my mind about it - as everyone else may too.
Well i am not for closing this thread but for leaving it as it is. People might get offended and we dont want to make a mountain out of a molehill
-
What…No one listens to me? Screw you guys, I’m out of here then.
-
Kuze wrote:
IMO time to turn the key and close this topicNah, it’s all good. This is still by far a tame topic and I see no need to close it yet.
@Timmy: lol
-
Huor wrote:
I just dont like the behaviour of a community to kick at him whilst he is already down. Regardless of what he has done. He must not be treated the same way in return.scratches head
You’re mis-representing Is it intentionally done?? I don’t know… giggles at provocation
To clarify - how many registered members are there here? How many are posting in this thread, and then how many have actively “kicked him whilst he is already down”.
One or two people, if even kicking him whilst he can’t reply, doth not a community represent! So no, it’s not a “community” behaviour in the sense of the Starport. It is one or two individuals.
As for being treated the same way in return? Again, not sure I quite honestly understand what you infer. Are you saying you’re not allowed to voice an opinion upon the questionable, or even disgusting, behaviour exhibited by someone if they’re not able to respond?
It’d kind of mean no discussion of any event, or incident, in the history, and future, of the entire world…unless all parties are present.
Can I no longer call Hitler a douche?
-
Thaddeus wrote:
Chips wrote:
Can I no longer call Hitler a douche?
@Chips: Thanks for proving Godwins law,
no offense, but always makes me lol
and as such, maybe this has gone on long enough, time to move on….
giggles
It honestly seemed like the least likely candidate to offend anyone
However, methinks you need to read the law once more - as thou art referring to it wrongly
in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably criticizes some point made in the discussion by comparing it to beliefs held by Hitler and the Nazis.
I’m in the clear whew
-
lol, all I remember is that the longer the thread continues the chance of the words being used increases at an exponential rate.
-
Thaddeus wrote:
lol, all I remember is that the longer the thread continues the chance of the words being used increases at an exponential rate.I quoted a relevant piece of Godwin’s Law from Wikipedia to correct an incorrectly applied assertion!
It would have been hard to clarify without the quote…Yeah, I’m passing the hot potato of mentions back to you sucker!
-
On a much more riveting note:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BM0WHFCNSlA
You know you want to, Ruppet.